🤖 AI Summary
This study examines the causal impact of the 1948 establishment of the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) on early-life mortality and whether it induced selective survival. Leveraging a regression discontinuity design, newly digitized weekly mortality records, UK Biobank data, and two longitudinal cohorts, the research uniquely integrates a historical policy intervention with genome-wide polygenic indices (PGIs) to trace long-term shifts in population genetic architecture. Findings indicate that the NHS significantly reduced stillbirth and infant mortality. Moreover, birth cohorts conceived after the NHS implementation carried higher loads of health-disadvantage PGIs and lower loads of health-advantage PGIs—an effect of 0.075 standard deviations—particularly pronounced among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups and males. These results reveal that universal public healthcare can reshape population genetic composition through mechanisms of selective survival.
📝 Abstract
The establishment of the UK National Health Service (NHS) in July 1948 was one of the most consequential health policy interventions of the twentieth century, providing universal and free access to medical care and substantially expanding maternal and infant health services. In this paper, we estimate the causal effect of the NHS introduction on early-life mortality and we test whether survival is selective. We adopt a regression discontinuity design under local randomization, comparing individuals born just before and just after July 1948. Leveraging newly digitized weekly death records, we document a significant decline in stillbirths and infant mortality following the introduction of the NHS, the latter driven primarily by reductions in deaths from congenital conditions and diarrhea. We then use polygenic indexes (PGIs), fixed at conception, to track changes in population composition, showing that cohorts born at or after the NHS introduction exhibit higher PGIs associated with contextually-adverse traits (e.g., depression, COPD, and preterm birth) and lower PGIs associated with contextually-valued traits (e.g., educational attainment, self-rated health, and pregnancy length), with effect sizes as large as 7.5% of a standard deviation. These results based on the UK Biobank data are robust to family-based designs and replicate in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing and the UK Household Longitudinal Study. Effects are strongest in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas and among males. This novel evidence on the existence and magnitude of selective survival highlights how large-scale public policies can leave a persistent imprint on population composition and generate long-term survival biases.