🤖 AI Summary
This work re-examines the necessity of asynchronous stochastic gradient descent (SGD) in distributed optimization by rigorously analyzing synchronous SGD and its robust variant, m-synchronous SGD, under a realistic heterogeneous setting that combines stochastic computation delays with adversarial partial participation. Through theoretical analysis, the authors demonstrate that the time complexity of these synchronous methods deviates from the optimal only by a logarithmic factor. By introducing a more practical heterogeneity model that unifies both random and adversarial elements, the study systematically evaluates the convergence efficiency of synchronous approaches and reveals their near-optimality across a broad range of heterogeneous scenarios. These findings challenge the prevailing assumption that asynchronous methods are indispensable for efficient distributed optimization in heterogeneous environments.
📝 Abstract
Modern distributed optimization methods mostly rely on traditional synchronous approaches, despite substantial recent progress in asynchronous optimization. We revisit Synchronous SGD and its robust variant, called $m$-Synchronous SGD, and theoretically show that they are nearly optimal in many heterogeneous computation scenarios, which is somewhat unexpected. We analyze the synchronous methods under random computation times and adversarial partial participation of workers, and prove that their time complexities are optimal in many practical regimes, up to logarithmic factors. While synchronous methods are not universal solutions and there exist tasks where asynchronous methods may be necessary, we show that they are sufficient for many modern heterogeneous computation scenarios.