Boost+: Equitable, Incentive-Compatible Block Building

πŸ“… 2026-02-03
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This work addresses the excessive centralization induced by Ethereum’s current MEV-Boost mechanism, which undermines fairness, efficiency, and transparency in block construction. To mitigate this, the authors propose M_Boost+, a novel mechanism that decouples block building into two distinct phases: transaction collection and transaction ordering. This design ensures all builders have equal access to transactions and introduces an incentive-compatible default ordering algorithm that encourages both searchers and builders to act honestly. Theoretical analysis demonstrates that, under scenarios with conflict-free transactions, truthful behavior constitutes a dominant equilibrium. Empirical backtesting using historical data further validates that M_Boost+ enhances both fairness and block space utilization, showing that even non-integrated participants are incentivized to participate honestly despite the presence of integration advantages.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Block space on the blockchain is scarce and must be allocated efficiently through block building. However, Ethereum's current block-building ecosystem, MEV-Boost, has become highly centralized due to integration, which distorts competition, reduces blockspace efficiency, and obscures MEV flow transparency. To guarantee equitability and economic efficiency in block building, we propose $\mathrm{Boost+}$, a system that decouples the process into collecting and ordering transactions, and ensures equal access to all collected transactions. The core of $\mathrm{Boost+}$ is the mechanism $\mathit{M}_{\mathrm{Boost+}}$, built around a default algorithm. $\mathit{M}_{\mathrm{Boost+}}$ aligns incentives for both searchers (intermediaries that generate or route transactions) and builders: Truthful bidding is a dominant strategy for all builders. For searchers, truthful reporting is dominant whenever the default algorithm dominates competing builders, and it remains dominant for all conflict-free transactions, even when builders may win. We further show that even if a searcher can technically integrate with a builder, non-integration combined with truthful bidding still dominates any deviation for conflict-free transactions. We also implement a concrete default algorithm informed by empirical analysis of real-world transactions and evaluate its efficacy using historical transaction data.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

blockchain
MEV
block building
centralization
equitability
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Boost+
MEV
incentive compatibility
block building
transaction ordering
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.