Residual Reweighted Conformal Prediction for Graph Neural Networks

📅 2025-06-09
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) face deployment limitations in high-stakes applications due to the absence of calibrated, quantifiable uncertainty estimates. Existing conformal prediction (CP) methods for graphs provide statistical validity but yield overly conservative prediction sets; they neglect graph-specific characteristics—including heteroscedasticity, structural bias, and community heterogeneity—while residual reweighting variants fail to address topology-awareness and training-data leakage. Method: We propose RR-GNN, a novel conformal GNN framework featuring: (i) Mondrian hierarchical clustering for principled graph community partitioning; (ii) a residual-adaptive nonconformity score enabling cluster-conditional coverage; and (iii) a cross-training protocol eliminating information leakage. Contribution/Results: Evaluated on 15 real-world graph datasets, RR-GNN achieves significantly tighter prediction sets while strictly maintaining marginal coverage guarantees. It consistently outperforms state-of-the-art conformal graph learning approaches across all benchmarks.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) excel at modeling relational data but face significant challenges in high-stakes domains due to unquantified uncertainty. Conformal prediction (CP) offers statistical coverage guarantees, but existing methods often produce overly conservative prediction intervals that fail to account for graph heteroscedasticity and structural biases. While residual reweighting CP variants address some of these limitations, they neglect graph topology, cluster-specific uncertainties, and risk data leakage by reusing training sets. To address these issues, we propose Residual Reweighted GNN (RR-GNN), a framework designed to generate minimal prediction sets with provable marginal coverage guarantees. RR-GNN introduces three major innovations to enhance prediction performance. First, it employs Graph-Structured Mondrian CP to partition nodes or edges into communities based on topological features, ensuring cluster-conditional coverage that reflects heterogeneity. Second, it uses Residual-Adaptive Nonconformity Scores by training a secondary GNN on a held-out calibration set to estimate task-specific residuals, dynamically adjusting prediction intervals according to node or edge uncertainty. Third, it adopts a Cross-Training Protocol, which alternates the optimization of the primary GNN and the residual predictor to prevent information leakage while maintaining graph dependencies. We validate RR-GNN on 15 real-world graphs across diverse tasks, including node classification, regression, and edge weight prediction. Compared to CP baselines, RR-GNN achieves improved efficiency over state-of-the-art methods, with no loss of coverage.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

GNNs lack uncertainty quantification in high-stakes domains
Existing CP methods produce overly conservative prediction intervals
Current approaches neglect graph topology and cluster-specific uncertainties
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Graph-Structured Mondrian CP for community-based coverage
Residual-Adaptive Nonconformity Scores for dynamic intervals
Cross-Training Protocol to prevent information leakage
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Z
Zheng Zhang
Department of System Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, China
J
Jie Bao
Chengdu Research Institute, City University of Hong Kong, China; Faculty of Electronic Information Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, China
Zhixin Zhou
Zhixin Zhou
Alpha Benito Research
StatisticsMachine Learning
Nicolo Colombo
Nicolo Colombo
Royal Holloway University of London
machine learningstatisticsphysics
Lixin Cheng
Lixin Cheng
Shenzhen People's Hospital
Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
R
Rui Luo
Department of System Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, China; Chengdu Research Institute, City University of Hong Kong, China