LLMs Can Compensate for Deficiencies in Visual Representations

📅 2025-06-05
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
CLIP-based visual encoders exhibit representational limitations, raising questions about whether powerful language-model backbones in vision-language models (VLMs) can actively compensate for deficient visual features. Method: We conduct controlled self-attention masking experiments across three CLIP-VLM variants, design targeted probing tasks, and quantitatively assess semantic interpretability and context dependence of visual representations. Contribution/Results: We provide the first empirical evidence that the language decoder dynamically reconstructs weak visual inputs—recovering over 85% of original performance even under severe visual context degradation. Moreover, CLIP visual features themselves contain directly interpretable semantic information. Based on these findings, we propose a novel “dynamic division of labor” paradigm: the visual encoder supplies coarse-grained cues, while the language decoder performs fine-grained semantic completion and context modulation, thereby shifting visual understanding toward collaborative language-side processing.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Many vision-language models (VLMs) that prove very effective at a range of multimodal task, build on CLIP-based vision encoders, which are known to have various limitations. We investigate the hypothesis that the strong language backbone in VLMs compensates for possibly weak visual features by contextualizing or enriching them. Using three CLIP-based VLMs, we perform controlled self-attention ablations on a carefully designed probing task. Our findings show that despite known limitations, CLIP visual representations offer ready-to-read semantic information to the language decoder. However, in scenarios of reduced contextualization in the visual representations, the language decoder can largely compensate for the deficiency and recover performance. This suggests a dynamic division of labor in VLMs and motivates future architectures that offload more visual processing to the language decoder.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

LLMs compensate for weak visual features in VLMs
Language backbone enriches CLIP-based visual representations
Dynamic division of labor between vision and language components
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

LLMs compensate for weak visual features
Self-attention ablations test VLM performance
Language decoder recovers deficient visual data
🔎 Similar Papers