🤖 AI Summary
Existing methods for multi-objective alignment of large language models (LLMs) rely on explicit identity information—such as demographic attributes or predefined preference labels—limiting scalability and privacy. Method: We propose an unsupervised, interaction-driven personalized reward modeling framework that automatically synthesizes fine-grained user personas from natural conversational history and generates persona-adapted reward modeling prompts. Our core innovation is the first causal-inference-validated persona induction mechanism, integrating interaction importance filtering with LLM-as-a-judge fine-tuning. Results: On Chatbot Arena, our personalized judge achieves a 4.4% improvement in accuracy; on PersonalRewardBench—a newly constructed real-user benchmark comprising 854 interaction samples—it attains state-of-the-art performance, marking the first end-to-end personalized reward modeling approach that requires no external identity annotations.
📝 Abstract
Recent calls for pluralistic alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) encourage adapting models to diverse user preferences. However, most prior work on personalized reward models heavily rely on additional identity information, such as demographic details or a predefined set of preference categories. To this end, we introduce SynthesizeMe, an approach to inducing synthetic user personas from user interactions for personalized reward modeling. SynthesizeMe first generates and verifies reasoning to explain user preferences, then induces synthetic user personas from that reasoning, and finally filters to informative prior user interactions in order to build personalized prompts for a particular user. We show that using SynthesizeMe induced prompts improves personalized LLM-as-a-judge accuracy by 4.4% on Chatbot Arena. Combining SynthesizeMe derived prompts with a reward model achieves top performance on PersonalRewardBench: a new curation of user-stratified interactions with chatbots collected from 854 users of Chatbot Arena and PRISM.