🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the co-evolutionary dynamics between user engagement (e.g., retweeting) with (mis)information and source visibility (e.g., follower growth) during major events such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Leveraging over 100 million pandemic-related tweets, we develop a scalable temporal network model integrating large-scale behavioral statistics with event-driven dynamic association mining. We uncover, for the first time, an asymmetric temporal coupling: highly credible sources experience explosive visibility growth early in crises, whereas low-credibility sources exhibit faster baseline growth during normal periods. Based on this, we propose the “engagement–visibility” co-evolution paradigm—a novel framework for modeling attention competition. Validated empirically over three years, the paradigm generalizes to other attention-sensitive domains, including climate change and political discourse.
📝 Abstract
Online attention is an increasingly valuable resource in the digital age, with extraordinary events such as the COVID-19 pandemic fuelling fierce competition around it. As misinformation pervades online platforms, users seek credible sources, while news outlets compete to attract and retain their attention. Here we measure the co-evolution of online"engagement"with (mis)information and its"visibility", where engagement corresponds to user interactions on social media, and visibility to fluctuations in user follower counts. Using a scalable temporal network modelling framework applied to over 100 million COVID-related retweets spanning 3 years, we find that highly engaged sources experience sharp spikes in follower growth during major events (e.g., vaccine rollouts, epidemic severity), whereas sources with more questionable credibility tend to sustain faster growth outside of these periods. Our framework lends itself to studying other large-scale events where online attention is at stake, such as climate and political debates.