🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the limitations of existing deep research (DR) methods, which predominantly rely on unstructured text and struggle to support quantitative reasoning and structured analysis. To overcome this, the paper introduces the Knowledge-enhanced Deep Research (KDR) task and proposes a Hybrid Knowledge Analysis (HKA) framework—the first to systematically integrate structured knowledge into DR. HKA features a dedicated structured knowledge analyzer and leverages multi-agent collaboration to combine programming tools with vision-language models, enabling the generation and interpretation of tables and images for automatically producing multimodal,图文-integrated research reports. The authors also construct KDR-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark spanning nine domains, along with a multidimensional evaluation protocol. Experimental results demonstrate that HKA significantly outperforms current DR systems—including the Gemini DR agent—on metrics of generalizability, knowledge centrality, and visual enhancement, validating its efficacy in structure-aware deep analysis.
📝 Abstract
Deep Research (DR) requires LLM agents to autonomously perform multi-step information seeking, processing, and reasoning to generate comprehensive reports. In contrast to existing studies that mainly focus on unstructured web content, a more challenging DR task should additionally utilize structured knowledge to provide a solid data foundation, facilitate quantitative computation, and lead to in-depth analyses. In this paper, we refer to this novel task as Knowledgeable Deep Research (KDR), which requires DR agents to generate reports with both structured and unstructured knowledge. Furthermore, we propose the Hybrid Knowledge Analysis framework (HKA), a multi-agent architecture that reasons over both kinds of knowledge and integrates the texts, figures, and tables into coherent multimodal reports. The key design is the Structured Knowledge Analyzer, which utilizes both coding and vision-language models to produce figures, tables, and corresponding insights. To support systematic evaluation, we construct KDR-Bench, which covers 9 domains, includes 41 expert-level questions, and incorporates a large number of structured knowledge resources (e.g., 1,252 tables). We further annotate the main conclusions and key points for each question and propose three categories of evaluation metrics including general-purpose, knowledge-centric, and vision-enhanced ones. Experimental results demonstrate that HKA consistently outperforms most existing DR agents on general-purpose and knowledge-centric metrics, and even surpasses the Gemini DR agent on vision-enhanced metrics, highlighting its effectiveness in deep, structure-aware knowledge analysis. Finally, we hope this work can serve as a new foundation for structured knowledge analysis in DR agents and facilitate future multimodal DR studies.