Autoformulation of Mathematical Optimization Models Using LLMs

📅 2024-11-03
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 4
Influential: 1
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the autoformulation problem—automatically translating natural-language problem descriptions into solvable mathematical optimization models. We propose the first LLM-driven Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) framework for this task, enabling dynamic hypothesis generation and formal correctness evaluation. Our method integrates hierarchical optimization modeling representations, LLM-based semantic understanding, and MCTS-based search strategies. A key innovation is an equivalence-aware pruning mechanism that reduces search overhead by over 40%. Empirically, our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on LP/MIP benchmarks, outperforming all existing baselines. LLM-assisted verification accelerates correctness assessment significantly. Moreover, this work formally defines the autoformulation task for the first time, establishing a scalable, automated paradigm to lower the barrier to optimization modeling and empower domain experts.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Mathematical optimization is fundamental to decision-making across diverse domains, from operations research to healthcare. Yet, translating real-world problems into optimization models remains a formidable challenge, often demanding specialized expertise. This paper formally introduces the concept of $ extbf{autoformulation}$ -- an automated approach to creating optimization models from natural language descriptions for commercial solvers. We identify the three core challenges of autoformulation: (1) defining the vast, problem-dependent hypothesis space, (2) efficiently searching this space under uncertainty, and (3) evaluating formulation correctness (ensuring a formulation accurately represents the problem). To address these challenges, we introduce a novel method leveraging $ extit{Large Language Models}$ (LLMs) within a $ extit{Monte-Carlo Tree Search}$ framework. This approach systematically explores the space of possible formulations by exploiting the hierarchical nature of optimization modeling. LLMs serve two key roles: as dynamic formulation hypothesis generators and as evaluators of formulation correctness. To enhance search efficiency, we introduce a pruning technique to remove trivially equivalent formulations. Empirical evaluations across benchmarks containing linear and mixed-integer programming problems demonstrate our method's superior performance. Additionally, we observe significant efficiency gains from employing LLMs for correctness evaluation and from our pruning techniques.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Automating solver-ready optimization models from natural language descriptions
Addressing vast problem-dependent hypothesis spaces in model formulation
Ensuring formulation correctness against problem descriptions efficiently
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Leverages LLMs with Monte-Carlo Tree Search
Introduces symbolic pruning for efficiency
Uses LLM-based evaluation of partial formulations
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.