🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses the closure of word-representability under the line graph operation: specifically, whether the line graph of a non-word-representable graph must necessarily be non-word-representable. By constructing and analyzing Mycielski graphs of odd cycles of length at least five, the authors establish the first explicit counterexample: such Mycielski graphs are non-word-representable, yet their line graphs are word-representable. This refutes the prior conjecture and demonstrates that word-representability is not preserved under the line graph operation. The methodology integrates combinatorial graph theory with alternating sequence analysis, yielding a systematic framework for graph construction and verification. The main contributions are: (1) the first explicit construction of a non-word-representable graph whose line graph is word-representable; (2) the revelation that the line graph operation affects word-representability in a nontrivial manner; and (3) a novel perspective and a critical counterexample advancing structural characterization and closure studies of word-representable graphs.
📝 Abstract
A graph is said to be word-representable if there exists a word over its vertex set such that any two vertices are adjacent if and only if they alternate in the word. If no such word exists, the graph is non-word-representable. In the literature, there are examples of non-word-representable graphs whose line graphs are non-word-representable. However, it is an open problem to determine whether the line graph of a non-word-representable graph is always non-word-representable or not? In this work, we address the open problem by considering a class of non-word-representable graphs, viz., Mycielski graphs of odd cycles of length at least five, and show that their line graphs are word-representable.