Computational Complexity of Non-Hermitian Quantum Systems

📅 2025-06-03
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work investigates the computational complexity of non-Hermitian quantum dynamics, specifically whether postselected conditional evolution—induced by measurement and postselection—can yield computational power beyond classical capabilities. Method: We establish a bidirectional equivalence between non-Hermitian gates and the complexity class PostBQP. Using Trotter decomposition, singular-value analysis, and low-rank tensor networks, we characterize simulability in terms of the structural properties and singular-value spectrum of purified unitary operators. Contribution/Results: We prove that non-Hermitian gates satisfying a singular-value radius constraint efficiently simulate PostBQP; conversely, any non-Hermitian evolution admits a “compact purification” via ancillary qubits and postselection. Consequently, universal non-Hermitian quantum computation is equivalent to PostBQP—and thus not scalable. Moreover, we derive sufficient criteria for efficient classical simulation, clarifying that non-Hermitian dynamics neither inherently enables quantum advantage nor is universally classically simulable.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
We analyze the computational power of non-Hermitian quantum dynamics, i.e., conditional time evolutions that arise when a quantum system is monitored and one postselects on a particular measurement record. We establish an approximate equivalence between post-selection and arbitrary non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. Namely, first we establish hardness in the following sense: Let $U=e^{-iHt}$ be an NH gate on $n$ qubits whose smallest and largest singular values differ by at least $2^{- ext{poly}(n)}$. Together with any universal set of unitary gates, the ability to apply such a gate lets one efficiently emulate postselection. The resulting model decides every language in PostBQP; hence, under standard complexity conjectures, fully scalable NH quantum computers are unlikely to be engineered. Second, we establish upper bounds which show that conversely, any non-Hermitian evolution can be written as a unitary on a system-meter pair followed by postselecting the meter. This ``purification'' is compact -- it introduces only $O(delta^{2})$ Trotter error per time step $delta$ -- so any NH model whose purification lies in a strongly simulable unitary family (e.g., Clifford, matchgate, or low-bond-dimension tensor-network circuits) remains efficiently simulable. Thus, non-Hermitian physics neither guarantees a quantum advantage nor precludes efficient classical simulation: its complexity is controlled by the singular-value radius of the evolution operator and by the structure of its unitary purification.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Analyzing computational power of non-Hermitian quantum dynamics
Establishing equivalence between post-selection and non-Hermitian Hamiltonians
Determining conditions for efficient classical simulation of NH systems
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Non-Hermitian dynamics emulate postselection efficiently
Purification introduces minimal Trotter error
Complexity depends on singular-value radius
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
B
B. Barch
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA; Center for Quantum Information Science & Technology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA
Daniel Lidar
Daniel Lidar
Viterbi Professor of Engineering, University of Southern California
quantum informationquantum computationquantum error correctionquantum controlquantum algorithms