Scalable and Interpretable Representation Alignment with Ordinal Similarity

πŸ“… 2026-06-15
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
Existing representation similarity measures often suffer from poor interpretability, sensitivity to outliers, and limited scalability to large datasets. This work proposes a representation alignment framework grounded in ordinal similarity, which quantifies the consistency of local ordinal relationships between representations using triplet (TSI) and quadruplet (QSI) similarity indices. The study establishes, for the first time, a theoretical equivalence between ordinal similarity and local alignment criteria such as mutual nearest neighbors. Combining interpretability, robustness, and scalability, the proposed method leverages efficient ranking algorithms and demonstrates significant performance gains over existing metrics in large-scale experiments, offering a reliable tool for representation understanding and design.
πŸ“ Abstract
Evaluating representation similarity is fundamental to representation learning. However, existing metrics suffer from significant limitations: they lack interpretability due to shifting baselines, lack robustness to outliers, and are computationally intractable for large datasets, forcing reliance on heuristic approximations. To address this, we develop an ordinal-similarity framework, instantiated by the Triplet (TSI) and Quadruplet (QSI) Similarity Indices, which measure alignment by quantifying the consistency of ordinal relationships. We theoretically demonstrate this formulation is inherently interpretable, robust to outliers, and computationally efficient. Finally, we establish a formal equivalence between TSI and local neighborhood alignment, measured by Mutual Nearest Neighbors. Empirically, we validate these properties and show that ordinal similarity offers a scalable approach to measuring alignment, enabling practitioners to better understand and design representations.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

representation similarity
interpretability
scalability
robustness
computational tractability
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

ordinal similarity
representation alignment
TSI
QSI
scalable evaluation