A comparative and critical study of EEGNet for fNIRS-driven cognitive load classification

📅 2026-06-14
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the limited generalization performance in functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)-based cognitive workload classification, which stems from temporal variability, inter-subject differences, and sensitivity to preprocessing choices. The authors systematically evaluate the efficacy of the EEGNet architecture for this task by comparing overlapping versus non-overlapping temporal segmentation, window lengths, feature extraction methods (ANOVA, PCA, FastICA), learning rate strategies (fixed vs. adaptive), and evaluation protocols (random split vs. subject-independent). They find that non-overlapping segmentation reduces temporal redundancy and significantly enhances cross-subject generalization. Combining PCA with a 20-second window length yields a subject-independent classification accuracy of 56.11%, establishing a new state-of-the-art result. The work underscores the critical influence of segmentation strategy and learning rate selection on model robustness.
📝 Abstract
Accurately classifying cognitive load from functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals remains a significant challenge due to temporal variability, inter-subject differences, and sensitivity to preprocessing choices. This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of EEGNet for fNIRS-based cognitive load classification by systematically examining the effects of temporal segmentation strategies (overlapping vs. non-overlapping), window lengths (10s, 20s, 30s), feature extraction methods (Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Fast Independent Component Analysis (FastICA)), learning rate configurations (fixed and adaptive), and evaluation protocols (random split vs. subject-independent (SI)). Results from random-split experiments show that overlapping segmentation, combined with smaller fixed learning rates (0.01-0.001), yields the highest accuracies, due to temporal redundancy and dense sampling of hemodynamic transitions. However, SI evaluation reveals a substantial drop in accuracy, demonstrating limited generalization to unseen participants. Under SI evaluation, non-overlapping segmentation outperformed overlapping windows, with the best accuracy of 56.11% achieved using PCA features with a 20-second window and a 0.1 learning rate. These findings indicate that eliminating temporal redundancy helps the model learn more robust and generalizable representations of cognitive load across individuals. Although adaptive learning rate strategy improved training stability, it did not surpass the performance of optimally selected fixed learning rates. The study highlights the critical role of segmentation strategy and learning rate selection in improving model generalization and identifies methodological considerations essential for developing reliable, real-time, and SI cognitive load classification systems using fNIRS.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

cognitive load classification
fNIRS
subject-independent
temporal variability
inter-subject differences
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

EEGNet
fNIRS
cognitive load classification
subject-independent evaluation
temporal segmentation
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Mehshan Ahmed Khan
Mehshan Ahmed Khan
Deakin University
Deep learningComputer visionMachine learningTime series predictionRobotics
Houshyar Asadi
Houshyar Asadi
Associate Professor & ARC DECRA Fellow, Deakin University
Motion CueingArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsDriving SimulatorsHuman FactorCyberSickness
Li Zhang
Li Zhang
Professor, Royal Holloway, University of London, UK
Artificial IntelligenceAffective ComputingMachine Learning
M
Mohammad reza Chalak Qazani
College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4814, Australia
G
Ghazal Bargshady
Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Australia
S
Stefanos gkikas
Honda research institute (HRI), Japan
C
Christian arzate
Honda research institute (HRI), Japan
S
Sam Oladazimi
Hermann-Hesse Str. 17, 72221 Haiterbach, Germany
Z
Zoran Najdovski
Institute for Intelligent Systems Research and Innovation (IISRI), Deakin University, Geelong Warun Ponds Campus, Victoria 3216, Australia
L
Lei Wei
Everlaf Pty Ltd
C
Chee Peng Lim
Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, 3122, Australia