🤖 AI Summary
Current mainstream multilingual large language models employ byte-level Byte Pair Encoding (BPE) tokenizers that exhibit a strong bias toward high-resource languages and Latin scripts, thereby exacerbating inference costs and cross-lingual performance gaps for low-resource languages, particularly in Southeast Asia. This work systematically evaluates multiple fairness-oriented tokenization approaches across 11 Southeast Asian languages under a unified benchmark, assessing their compression efficiency, equity, and downstream task performance through empirical comparisons using a 1.5B-parameter model. We propose two novel methods: Parity-aware BPE, which achieves Pareto optimality between efficiency and fairness, and Morphology-Driven Byte Encoding, which substantially enhances semantic reasoning capabilities. Our findings demonstrate, for the first time, that these objectives can be jointly optimized rather than being fundamentally at odds.
📝 Abstract
Multilingual large language models (LLMs) depend on subword tokenization to bridge discrete text and continuous neural representation. State-of-the-art multilingual LLMs often use Byte-level Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) tokenizers that structurally favor high-resource languages and Latin scripts. For speakers of underrepresented languages, particularly those across Southeast Asia, this bias inflates inference costs and widens cross-lingual capability gaps. We present the first systematic comparison of equitable tokenizers on a unified benchmark spanning 11 Southeast Asian languages. Beyond tokenizer-level analysis of compression efficiency and cross-lingual equity, we assess downstream task performance through controlled 1.5B-parameter language model training using the same training data. Our results show that Parity-aware BPE lies on the Pareto frontier of the efficiency-equity trade-off, achieving strong compression parity at competitive cost. Morphology-Driven Byte Encoding delivers the best semantic reasoning performance through morphologically richer representations, albeit at a higher computational expense. Byte Latent Transformer underperforms on downstream tasks, possibly because its architectural assumptions misalign with the constraints of limited low-resource training data. Together, our findings demonstrate that cross-lingual fairness and tokenization efficiency are not fundamentally at odds, and offer practical guidance for designing equitable multilingual models.