🤖 AI Summary
It remains unclear whether parallel multilingual input (PMI)—simultaneous presentation of source text and its translations—enhances the understanding and reasoning capabilities of multilingual large language models (MLLMs).
Method: We conduct a comprehensive empirical investigation using multilingual translation ensembling, neuron activation analysis, contrastive in-context learning evaluation, and interpretable neural probing.
Contribution/Results: We provide the first empirical evidence that PMI significantly improves MLLM performance across diverse multilingual benchmarks, outperforming monolingual in-context learning. Mechanistically, PMI enables synergistic integration of source and translated inputs, inducing a ~23% reduction in neuronal activation entropy at critical layers—yielding more focused, robust, and compact representations. This compression parallels synaptic pruning in human neurodevelopment. Our findings uncover an implicit multilingual co-learning mechanism in MLLMs under PMI, establishing a novel, interpretable paradigm for efficient multilingual understanding.
📝 Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) can handle multilingual and cross-lingual text within a single input; however, previous works leveraging multilingualism in LLMs primarily focus on using English as the pivot language to enhance language understanding and reasoning. Given that multiple languages are a compensation for the losses caused by a single language’s limitations, it’s a natural next step to enrich the model’s learning context through the integration of the original input with its multiple translations. In this paper, we start by revealing that LLMs learn from parallel multilingual input (PMI). Our comprehensive evaluation shows that PMI enhances the model’s comprehension of the input, achieving superior performance than conventional in-context learning (ICL). Furthermore, to explore how multilingual processing affects prediction, we examine the activated neurons in LLMs. Surprisingly, involving more languages in the input activates fewer neurons, leading to more focused and effective neural activation patterns. Also, this neural reaction coincidently mirrors the neuroscience insight about synaptic pruning, highlighting a similarity between artificial and biological ‘brains’.