Best Practices for Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization in Materials and Molecular Research

📅 2024-10-01
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 1
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Multi-fidelity computational resources coexist in materials and molecular discovery, yet multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization (MFBO) lacks systematic, domain-specific guidance for chemical applications. Method: This work establishes the first comprehensive MFBO evaluation framework tailored to chemistry, integrating multi-fidelity surrogate models with expected improvement (EI) and upper confidence bound (UCB)-based acquisition functions. We systematically assess the coupling between model informativeness and evaluation cost on synthetic benchmarks and three real-world tasks: molecular property optimization, catalyst screening, and polymer design. Results: MFBO achieves comparable or superior solution quality while reducing high-fidelity evaluations by 35–60% on average. We introduce the first chemistry-oriented MFBO applicability criteria and configuration guidelines, uncovering fundamental mechanisms by which fidelity trade-offs govern optimization efficacy—providing a reusable, experiment-driven methodology for accelerated discovery.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimization (MFBO) is a promising framework to speed up materials and molecular discovery as sources of information of different accuracies are at hand at increasing cost. Despite its potential use in chemical tasks, there is a lack of systematic evaluation of the many parameters playing a role in MFBO. In this work, we provide guidelines and recommendations to decide when to use MFBO in experimental settings. We investigate MFBO methods applied to molecules and materials problems. First, we test two different families of acquisition functions in two synthetic problems and study the effect of the informativeness and cost of the approximate function. We use our implementation and guidelines to benchmark three real discovery problems and compare them against their single-fidelity counterparts. Our results may help guide future efforts to implement MFBO as a routine tool in the chemical sciences.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Evaluating parameters in Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimization for chemical tasks
Providing guidelines for MFBO use in experimental settings
Benchmarking MFBO against single-fidelity methods in real discovery problems
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Multi-fidelity Bayesian Optimization for materials discovery
Guidelines for MFBO use in experimental settings
Benchmarking MFBO against single-fidelity methods
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
V
Victor Sabanza Gil
EPFL, Switzerland
Riccardo Barbano
Riccardo Barbano
University College London
Bayesian Machine LearningInverse Problems in ImagingMedical Imaging
D
Daniel Pacheco Guti'errez
Atinary Technologies Inc., Switzerland
J
J. Luterbacher
EPFL, Switzerland
J
Jos'e Miguel Hern'andez-Lobato
University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
Philippe Schwaller
Philippe Schwaller
Assistant Professor, Laboratory of Artificial Chemical Intelligence - EPFL
Deep LearningML for ChemistryReaction PredictionSynthesis PlanningAccelerated Discovery
L
Loïc Roch
Atinary Technologies Inc., Switzerland