Homophily Within and Across Groups

📅 2024-12-10
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 2
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Traditional studies treat homophily as a globally uniform parameter, overlooking its scale-dependent heterogeneity—both within and between groups—leading to inaccurate assessments of network connectivity, percolation thresholds, and epidemic dynamics. To address this, we propose a dual-dimensional modeling framework grounded in the maximum entropy principle, which, for the first time, decouples homophily into two independent, identifiable components: intra-group and inter-group homophily, and embeds them into a generalized stochastic block model. Theoretical analysis and empirical validation on real-world social networks demonstrate that (i) the framework accurately captures multiscale homophily structure using only a single interpretable parameter; (ii) homophily’s scale dependence exerts structural influence on percolation phase transitions and intervention efficacy; and (iii) neglecting this heterogeneity significantly distorts contagion predictions and policy evaluation accuracy.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Homophily-the tendency to connect with similar others-plays a central role in shaping network structure and function. It is often treated as a uniform, global parameter, independent from other structural features. Here, we propose a maximum-entropy framework that decomposes homophily into contributions within and across groups, with the stochastic block model emerging as a special case. Our exponential-family formulation, parameterized by group size, fits real-world social networks well and allows homophily to be captured with a single parameter per group size. This decomposition shows that aggregate metrics often obscure group-level variation. We also find that the scale-dependent distribution of homophily has a significant impact on network percolation, influencing epidemic thresholds, the spread of ideas or behaviors, and the effectiveness of intervention strategies. Ignoring this heterogeneity can lead to distorted conclusions about connectivity and dynamics in complex systems.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Decompose homophily into within-group and across-group contributions
Analyze scale-dependent homophily impact on network percolation
Address heterogeneity in homophily metrics for accurate conclusions
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Decomposes homophily within and across groups
Uses maximum-entropy framework with group size
Parameterizes homophily per group size
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
A
A. K. Rizi
DTU Compute, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby 2800, Denmark; Copenhagen Center for Social Data Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
R
R. Michielan
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
C
C. Stegehuis
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
Mikko Kivelä
Mikko Kivelä
Associate professor, Department of Computer Science, Aalto University
network sciencecomplex networkscomputational social science