Quantum Advantage in Tolerant Junta Testing

📅 2026-06-22
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work investigates the tolerant $k$-junta testing problem with high accuracy, which involves distinguishing whether a Boolean function is $\varepsilon_1$-close to or $\varepsilon_2$-far from some $k$-junta. In the adaptive setting, we propose a non-adaptive quantum query algorithm that efficiently decides the problem using only $\mathrm{poly}(k)$ queries for certain parameter regimes—for instance, when $\varepsilon_1 = 1/2 - 1/k$ and $\varepsilon_2 = 1/2 - 1/(2k^2)$. Furthermore, by constructing a novel “approximate junta” hard distribution based on error-correcting codes and combining information-theoretic and combinatorial techniques, we prove that any classical algorithm requires at least $k^{\Omega(\log k)}$ queries. This result establishes, for the first time, a super-polynomial quantum advantage in tolerant $k$-junta testing.
📝 Abstract
We establish the first super-polynomial quantum advantage for the tolerant junta testing problem in the adaptive setting. Specifically, we show that within a certain parameter regime, tolerant $k$-junta testing with high precision can be solved using $\mathrm{poly}(k)$ quantum queries, whereas any classical algorithm requires at least $k^{Ω(\log k)}$ queries. The problem of tolerant $k$-junta testing is as follows: given parameters $(k, ε_1, ε_2)$, with $0\le ε_1<ε_2 \le 1/2$, and black-box access to a Boolean function $f$ (defined on $n$ variables), distinguish whether $f$ is $ε_1$-close to some $k$-junta or $ε_2$-far from every $k$-junta. We show the quantum advantage for a range of parameters close to $1/2$, for example, $ε_1 = 1/2-1/k$ and $ε_2 = 1/2-1/(2k^2)$. The (non-adaptive) quantum tester we use was given by a recent work of Bao, Liu, Yao, Ye, and Zhang (SOSA 2026). We slightly adapt their analysis to show that it holds in the above parameter regime. On the other hand, our classical lower bound requires substantial new ideas. Inspired by the lower bound techniques of Chen and Patel (FOCS 2023), we introduce a new hard distribution of ``yes'' instances (i.e., instances with distance at most $ε_1$ to $k$-juntas) that is based on planting an ``approximate-junta'' as follows: we randomly pick $k$ out of $n$ coordinates, and for each fixing of the $k$ coordinates, the $2^{n-k}$ values in the restricted subcube are drawn randomly except for the set of points in an error-correcting code on which we place the same random bit. We show that this distribution is much closer to $k$-juntas than the uniform distribution, but on the other hand, they are indistinguishable with respect to any classical algorithm making $k^{o(\log k)}$ queries.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

tolerant junta testing
quantum advantage
Boolean function
query complexity
k-junta
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

quantum advantage
tolerant junta testing
query complexity
hard distribution
error-correcting code
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.