🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of dynamically rendering high-quality line drawings and textual light effects in indoor spaces. To this end, the authors propose LightBender, a drone swarm platform equipped with programmable LED strips and servo-actuated articulated rods. The system incorporates an automated estimation of required drone count, a formation control algorithm robust to airflow disturbances, and a streamlined deployment pipeline via a Blender plugin and the LB-Author tool, enabling one-click translation of SVG vector graphics into aerial light displays. Experimental results demonstrate a maximum positional error of 10.1 mm—within visually acceptable limits—and an average perceived graphic quality of 8 out of 10, confirming the system’s feasibility and expressive capability.
📝 Abstract
This study presents the hardware and software architecture of a transformative system for illuminating line drawings and letterforms. These mid-air illuminations are indoors and might be animated. The hardware contribution is a drone equipped with servo-actuated rod joints and a dense, addressable LED strip that enables arbitrary orientation, a LightBender. The software contributions are threefold. First, the system implements algorithms and heuristics to estimate the minimum number of LightBenders required to render a line drawing or letterform, stagger swarm formations to mitigate LightBender downwash, generate Swarm Flight and Lighting (SFL) files, and execute these files using a swarm of LightBenders to illuminate line drawings and letterforms. Second, a Blender add-on enables users to register LightBenders, author graphics and animations represented by swarms of LightBenders, and deploy the swarm for illumination through one-click functions. Third, users may import SVG files into either the Blender add-on or a standalone LB-Author tool to illuminate line drawings directly from vector graphics.
We present results from an IRB-approved human subject study (n=21) to evaluate the impact of LightBender misalignment on the perceived illuminations. Obtained results demonstrate that the system's 10.1 mm maximum misalignment is perceptually acceptable across tested illuminations, with a median quality rating of 8 on a 0-10 scale.