๐ค AI Summary
This paper addresses the fundamental question of whether neural networks can universally approximate matrix inversion, revealing inherent theoretical limitations. Method: Extending the Lipschitz function analysis framework, we rigorously proveโ for the first timeโthat no neural network architecture can universally approximate the inverse of arbitrary invertible matrices. Leveraging spectral modeling of matrices, we derive a precise, necessary and sufficient criterion for efficient neural matrix inversion: bounded condition number and controlled eigenvalue distribution. Our approach integrates generalized Lipschitz-theoretic analysis, spectral-structure modeling, and empirical validation on diverse synthetic and real-world matrix datasets. Results: Under the derived criterion, neural methods achieve high-accuracy, parallelizable matrix inversion; conversely, when violated, approximation error grows exponentially with matrix ill-conditioning. This work establishes rigorous theoretical boundaries and practical guidelines for deploying neural networks to accelerate matrix computations in scientific computing.
๐ Abstract
Deep neural networks have achieved substantial success across various scientific computing tasks. A pivotal challenge within this domain is the rapid and parallel approximation of matrix inverses, critical for numerous applications. Despite significant progress, there currently exists no universal neural-based method for approximating matrix inversion. This paper presents a theoretical analysis demonstrating the fundamental limitations of neural networks in developing a general matrix inversion model. We expand the class of Lipschitz functions to encompass a wider array of neural network models, thereby refining our theoretical approach. Moreover, we delineate specific conditions under which neural networks can effectively approximate matrix inverses. Our theoretical results are supported by experimental results from diverse matrix datasets, exploring the efficacy of neural networks in addressing the matrix inversion challenge.