🤖 AI Summary
3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) faces two key challenges in complex scenes: (1) conflicting gradient directions hinder effective splitting of large Gaussians, leading to over-reconstruction; and (2) regions with consistent gradient directions cause excessive Gaussian density, resulting in redundancy and memory explosion. To address these, we propose a gradient-direction-aware adaptive density control framework. Its core innovation is the Gradient Consistency Ratio (GCR), computed from the norm of normalized gradient vectors and integrated with a nonlinear dynamic weighting scheme to enable direction-aware density regulation during Gaussian splitting and cloning. Our method effectively suppresses both over-reconstruction and over-densification. Evaluated on multiple real-world scene benchmarks, it achieves superior rendering quality while reducing memory overhead by 50%. The resulting 3D Gaussian representation is significantly more compact and exhibits higher geometric fidelity.
📝 Abstract
The emergence of 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has significantly advanced novel view synthesis through explicit scene representation, enabling real-time photorealistic rendering. However, existing approaches manifest two critical limitations in complex scenarios: (1) Over-reconstruction occurs when persistent large Gaussians cannot meet adaptive splitting thresholds during density control. This is exacerbated by conflicting gradient directions that prevent effective splitting of these Gaussians; (2) Over-densification of Gaussians occurs in regions with aligned gradient aggregation, leading to redundant component proliferation. This redundancy significantly increases memory overhead due to unnecessary data retention. We present Gradient-Direction-Aware Gaussian Splatting (GDAGS), a gradient-direction-aware adaptive density control framework to address these challenges. Our key innovations: the gradient coherence ratio (GCR), computed through normalized gradient vector norms, which explicitly discriminates Gaussians with concordant versus conflicting gradient directions; and a nonlinear dynamic weighting mechanism leverages the GCR to enable gradient-direction-aware density control. Specifically, GDAGS prioritizes conflicting-gradient Gaussians during splitting operations to enhance geometric details while suppressing redundant concordant-direction Gaussians. Conversely, in cloning processes, GDAGS promotes concordant-direction Gaussian densification for structural completion while preventing conflicting-direction Gaussian overpopulation. Comprehensive evaluations across diverse real-world benchmarks demonstrate that GDAGS achieves superior rendering quality while effectively mitigating over-reconstruction, suppressing over-densification, and constructing compact scene representations with 50% reduced memory consumption through optimized Gaussians utilization.