π€ AI Summary
This study addresses the misalignment between conventional prediction-oriented scoring and selection objectives in complex target regionsβsuch as intervals, variance-driven sets, multimodal distributions, or multi-condition scenarios. To resolve this, the authors propose using target membership probability as a nonconformity score to directly rank binary selection events, combined with a null-calibrated conformal selection (NCCS) procedure that leverages non-target calibration samples to produce finite-sample valid p-values. This approach is the first to explicitly distinguish prediction from selection tasks and formalizes a target membership scoring principle. While maintaining comparable performance under mean-monotonic targets, it substantially improves selection efficacy in variance-driven and other complex settings. Moreover, in rare-target regimes, NCCS effectively mitigates the anti-conservatism of empirical FDP thresholds, achieving both high power and rigorous control of the false discovery rate in finite samples.
π Abstract
Conformal selection aims to identify test candidates whose unknown responses fall in a target region while controlling the false discovery rate. Existing methods often inherit prediction-oriented nonconformity scores, such as residual or clipped residual scores, from conformal prediction. We argue that the natural score for selection is instead the target-membership probability. This score directly addresses the binary event being selected, and any monotone transform of it gives the Neyman--Pearson oracle ranking at a fixed null selection level. This distinction is irrelevant for mean-monotone targets, where conventional scores induce essentially the same ranking, but becomes important for interval-valued, variance-driven, multimodal, or multi-condition targets, where prediction-oriented scores can be misaligned with selection power. We study membership-score-based conformal selection and isolate one conformal calibration route, Null-Calibrated Conformal Selection (NCCS), which ranks test scores against confirmed non-target calibration examples. Under null exchangeability, NCCS yields finite-sample valid null p-values, which can be combined with BY under arbitrary dependence or with BH under standard positive-dependence conditions. Experiments support the score principle: membership scores match conventional scores on mean-monotone targets, substantially improve over mean-score selection on variance-driven targets, and, when calibrated by NCCS, trade power for finite-sample null validity in rare-target regimes where direct empirical-FDP thresholding can be anti-conservative.