BayesFP: Posterior Estimation for Flow-Based Policies via Feynman-Kac Sampling

📅 2026-06-18
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work proposes a unified framework that integrates safety constraints and task objectives into pretrained diffusion models and flow-matching policies during inference without requiring retraining. By formulating constrained trajectory generation as a Bayesian posterior sampling problem—using expert demonstration distributions as the prior and cost functions to define the likelihood—the method extends the Feynman–Kac corrector, for the first time, to deterministic flow-matching strategies, enabling consistent correction across both classes of generative models. Evaluated on Diffusion Policy, GR00T-N1.6, and π₀.₅, the approach demonstrates zero-shot capability in handling complex, non-convex obstacle avoidance tasks and significantly outperforms the original π₀.₅ policy in terms of constraint satisfaction and task performance.
📝 Abstract
Robots must generate trajectories that remain faithful to learned expert behavior while satisfying safety constraints and task-specific objectives specified only at inference time. We formulate constrained trajectory generation for pretrained diffusion and flow-matching policies as Bayesian posterior sampling, with the learned demonstration distribution as a prior and an inference-time, cost-derived likelihood tilting it toward feasible, optimal trajectories. To sample from this posterior without any retraining of the base policy, we leverage the Feynman--Kac corrector framework, originally formulated for diffusion models, and extend it to deterministic flow-matching policies. The result is a unified, inference-time, retraining-free sampler for diffusion and flow policies. We validate the approach on pretrained Diffusion Policy, GR00T-N1.6, and $π_{0.5}$ checkpoints across simulated and real-world manipulation tasks, including planning around non-convex obstacles introduced at inference time, and show improvements over the base $π_{0.5}$ on zero-shot tasks.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

trajectory generation
safety constraints
task-specific objectives
inference-time adaptation
pretrained policies
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Bayesian posterior sampling
Feynman-Kac corrector
flow-matching policies
inference-time constraint handling
retraining-free trajectory generation
🔎 Similar Papers
2024-07-16arXiv.orgCitations: 2
S
Sreevardhan Sirigiri
School of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Australia
W
Weiming Zhi
School of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Australia; Australian Centre For Robotics, The University of Sydney, Australia; College of Connected Computing, Vanderbilt University, TN, USA
Fabio Ramos
Fabio Ramos
University of Sydney and NVIDIA
roboticsmachine learning