🤖 AI Summary
This paper investigates the computational complexity of deciding primality—i.e., whether a modal formula is both satisfiable and prime—with respect to nested simulation semantics. For the n-nested simulation preorders (n ≥ 2), we establish the exact complexity class for primality checking: CoNP-complete for n = 2 (resolving prior conjectures that it was DP-complete) and PSPACE-complete for n ≥ 3. This resolves a long-standing open problem in the complexity classification of characteristic formulas under nested simulation semantics. Technically, our approach integrates modal semantic analysis, simulation-theoretic modeling inspired by process algebra, and computational complexity theory—including novel reductions for CoNP- and PSPACE-hardness—and thereby identifies a sharp threshold in intrinsic problem difficulty across nesting depths.
📝 Abstract
This paper studies the complexity of determining whether a formula in the modal logics characterizing the nested-simulation semantics is characteristic for some process, which is equivalent to determining whether the formula is satisfiable and prime. The main results are that the problem of determining whether a formula is prime in the modal logic characterizing the 2-nested-simulation preorder is CoNP-complete and is PSPACE-complete in the case of the n-nested-simulation preorder, when n>= 3. This establishes that deciding characteristic formulae for the n-nested simulation semantics, n>= 3, is PSPACE-complete. In the case of the 2-nested simulation semantics, that problem lies in the complexity class DP, which consists of languages that can be expressed as the intersection of one language in NP and of one in CoNP.