Identification Verification for Structural Vector Autoregressions with Sparse Heterogeneous Markov Switching Heteroskedasticity

πŸ“… 2026-03-16
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This study addresses the identification uncertainty in structural vector autoregressive (SVAR) models arising from heteroskedasticity under time-varying volatility. To this end, the authors propose a sparse heterogeneous Markov-switching heteroskedastic SVAR model, wherein the conditional variances of individual structural shocks are governed by independent Markov processes. The model incorporates a sparsity mechanism to eliminate inactive states and introduces a normalized conditional variance distribution to facilitate Gibbs sampling and identification validation. By innovatively integrating Bayesian inference, sparse state representation, and structural normalization, the approach not only enables reliable testing of the homoskedasticity assumption but also substantially improves the accuracy and reliability of structural parameter estimation. Empirical results demonstrate that the model effectively identifies U.S. monetary policy shocks in macro-financial data and achieves predictive performance comparable to stochastic volatility models.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
We propose a structural vector autoregressive model with a new and flexible specification of the volatility process which we call Sparse Heterogeneous Markov-Switching Heteroskedasticity. In this model, the conditional variance of each structural shock changes in time according to its own Markov process. Additionally, it features a sparse representation of Markov processes, in which the number of regimes is set to exceed that of the data-generating process, with some regimes allowed to have zero occurrences throughout the sample. We complement these developments with a definition of a new distribution for normalised conditional variances that facilitates Gibbs sampling and identification verification. In effect, our model: (i) normalises the system and estimates the structural parameters more precisely than popular alternatives; (ii) can be used to verify homoskedasticity reliably and, thus, inform identification through heteroskedasticity; and (iii) features excellent forecasting performance comparable with Stochastic Volatility. Finally, revisiting a prominent macro-financial structural system, we provide evidence for the identification of the US monetary policy shock via heteroskedasticity, with estimates consistent with those reported in the literature.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Structural Vector Autoregression
Identification Verification
Markov-Switching Heteroskedasticity
Sparse Heterogeneous Volatility
Heteroskedasticity-based Identification
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Sparse Heterogeneous Markov-Switching
Structural Vector Autoregression
Heteroskedasticity-based Identification
Gibbs Sampling
Conditional Variance Normalization
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Fei Shang
Fei Shang
USTC
Wireless Sensing
T
Tomasz WoΕΊniak
University of Melbourne, 111 Barry St., 3053 Carlton, VIC, Australia