🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses the “spurious synthetic control problem” in macroeconomic applications of the Synthetic Control Method (SCM), wherein imposing common nonstationary trends across units induces bias in causal estimates. To resolve this, we propose the Synthetic Commercial Cycle Framework (SCCF), which adopts a “divide-and-conquer” strategy: it models the long-run trend solely using the treated unit’s own historical data, while leveraging only control units to estimate cyclical fluctuations—thereby decoupling trend and cycle components. SCCF integrates time-series decomposition with nonstationary counterfactual modeling. Applied to two canonical macroeconomic cases—German reunification and Hong Kong’s return to China—the framework substantially improves counterfactual prediction accuracy, eliminates trend misspecification bias, and enhances the robustness and reliability of causal inference for macroeconomic policy evaluation.
📝 Abstract
This paper investigates the use of synthetic control methods for causal inference in macroeconomic settings when dealing with possibly nonstationary data. While the synthetic control approach has gained popularity for estimating counterfactual outcomes, we caution researchers against assuming a common nonstationary trend factor across units for macroeconomic outcomes, as doing so may result in misleading causal estimation-a pitfall we refer to as the spurious synthetic control problem. To address this issue, we propose a synthetic business cycle framework that explicitly separates trend and cyclical components. By leveraging the treated unit's historical data to forecast its trend and using control units only for cyclical fluctuations, our divide-and-conquer strategy eliminates spurious correlations and improves the robustness of counterfactual prediction in macroeconomic applications. As empirical illustrations, we examine the cases of German reunification and the handover of Hong Kong, demonstrating the advantages of the proposed approach.