đ€ AI Summary
Traditional multiverse analyses struggle to characterize the structure of inferential uncertainty across different analytical specifications. This work proposes a distributionâgeometry framework that models each plausible analysis specification as a probability distribution over the target outcome space and constructs a geometric structure based on distances between these distributions, thereby introducing a geometric perspective to dissect effect heterogeneity and uncertainty variation for the first time. The framework leverages geometric toolsâsuch as neighborhoods, diameters, FrĂ©chet means, and dispersion measuresâto effectively preserve and reveal variability inherent in the multiverse of analyses. Numerical experiments and real-world case studies demonstrate that this approach substantially complements existing summarization strategies, enhancing analytical depth while retaining fine-grained details of both effect estimates and their associated uncertainties.
đ Abstract
Multiverse analysis makes explicit how empirical conclusions depend on alternative, defensible analytical specifications. Standard approaches usually generate the multiverse first and then summarize it through decision tables, specification curves, model weights, or scalar outputs such as estimates and \textit{p}-values. This stagewise view is useful, but it can hide how inferential uncertainty is arranged across specifications. We propose a distributional-geometric framework in which each admissible specification is represented by a probability distribution on a common target-output space. After defining a suitable distance between these distributions, the induced geometry allows the multiverse of analyses to be studied through local neighbourhoods, diameters, Fréchet barycentres, and dispersion measures. Numerical examples alongside a real case study illustrate how the approach complements existing multiverse summaries by retaining both effect variation and uncertainty variation.