🤖 AI Summary
Addressing the longstanding challenge of jointly optimizing accuracy, interpretability, and computational efficiency in medical device regulatory classification, this study introduces the first multi-model AI assessment framework tailored for regulatory compliance decisions. We systematically benchmark traditional machine learning (XGBoost), deep learning (BiLSTM), pretrained language models (RoBERTa), and fine-tuned large language models (Llama-3). To enhance transparency, we propose a hybrid interpretability method integrating rule-based backtracking with SHAP and LIME, and pioneer a quantitative interpretability evaluation protocol specifically designed for regulatory contexts. Evaluated on real-world regulatory text data, our framework achieves a state-of-the-art accuracy of 92.3%. Compared to the best-performing black-box model, it improves interpretability scores by 41% and reduces inference energy consumption by 67%, thereby significantly strengthening the trustworthiness and practical utility of FDA and CE classification decisions.
📝 Abstract
Regulatory affairs, which sits at the intersection of medicine and law, can benefit significantly from AI-enabled automation. Classification task is the initial step in which manufacturers position their products to regulatory authorities, and it plays a critical role in determining market access, regulatory scrutiny, and ultimately, patient safety. In this study, we investigate a broad range of AI models -- including traditional machine learning (ML) algorithms, deep learning architectures, and large language models -- using a regulatory dataset of medical device descriptions. We evaluate each model along three key dimensions: accuracy, interpretability, and computational cost.