PATS: Process-Level Adaptive Thinking Mode Switching

📅 2025-05-25
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Current large language models employ fixed reasoning strategies across all problems, compromising the trade-off between accuracy and efficiency; existing fast/slow thinking-switching methods only support coarse-grained, solution-level adaptation. This paper proposes a fine-grained, process-level adaptive thinking-switching paradigm: dynamically selecting fast or slow reasoning modes at each reasoning step based on step-wise difficulty estimation, incorporating a progressive switching mechanism and an error-step penalty strategy. We integrate a process reward model (PRM) with constrained beam search to enable real-time, difficulty-aware step evaluation and policy modulation. Evaluated on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks, our method achieves significant accuracy improvements while maintaining moderate average token consumption—demonstrating, for the first time, a high-quality balance between accuracy and efficiency at the step level.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Current large-language models (LLMs) typically adopt a fixed reasoning strategy, either simple or complex, for all questions, regardless of their difficulty. This neglect of variation in task and reasoning process complexity leads to an imbalance between performance and efficiency. Existing methods attempt to implement training-free fast-slow thinking system switching to handle problems of varying difficulty, but are limited by coarse-grained solution-level strategy adjustments. To address this issue, we propose a novel reasoning paradigm: Process-Level Adaptive Thinking Mode Switching (PATS), which enables LLMs to dynamically adjust their reasoning strategy based on the difficulty of each step, optimizing the balance between accuracy and computational efficiency. Our approach integrates Process Reward Models (PRMs) with Beam Search, incorporating progressive mode switching and bad-step penalty mechanisms. Experiments on diverse mathematical benchmarks demonstrate that our methodology achieves high accuracy while maintaining moderate token usage. This study emphasizes the significance of process-level, difficulty-aware reasoning strategy adaptation, offering valuable insights into efficient inference for LLMs.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

LLMs use fixed reasoning strategies for all questions
Current methods lack fine-grained process-level strategy adjustments
Need dynamic reasoning adaptation for accuracy-efficiency balance
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Dynamic reasoning strategy adjustment per step
Integrates Process Reward Models with Beam Search
Progressive mode switching with bad-step penalties
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.