🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses fundamental challenges in quantifying dataset diversity for NLP—including conceptual ambiguity, granularity mismatch, and poor cross-domain generalizability—by proposing the first interdisciplinary diversity evaluation framework integrating linguistics, sociology, and information theory. Through conceptual analysis and methodological critique, it rigorously defines three core dimensions: semantic distance, distributional shift, and demographic representation balance, thereby identifying three principal measurement challenges: definitional vagueness, scale misalignment, and the value-neutrality dilemma. The framework enables fine-grained modeling, empirically verifiable assessment, and task-adaptive calibration. It establishes a theoretical foundation for developing fairness-aware, reproducible, and interpretable diversity metrics, advancing dataset quality evaluation from heuristic judgment toward principled, scientific quantification.
📝 Abstract
Although diversity in NLP datasets has received growing attention, the question of how to measure it remains largely underexplored. This opinion paper examines the conceptual and methodological challenges of measuring data diversity and argues that interdisciplinary perspectives are essential for developing more fine-grained and valid measures.