Experimental robustness benchmark of quantum neural network on a superconducting quantum processor

📅 2025-05-22
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Quantum neural networks (QNNs) exhibit vulnerability to adversarial attacks, yet their adversarial robustness remains empirically uncharacterized on real quantum hardware. Method: We conduct the first systematic experimental evaluation of QNN classifier robustness against adversarial perturbations on a 20-qubit superconducting quantum processor. We propose the first QNN-specific adversarial attack algorithm, establish an efficient attack framework, and quantitatively characterize robustness boundaries. Contribution/Results: We discover that intrinsic quantum noise inherently enhances adversarial robustness. We theoretically derive and experimentally validate a fidelity-based lower bound on robustness, achieving tightness with a deviation of only $3 imes 10^{-3}$. Furthermore, we implement adversarial training via input-gradient regularization, significantly improving QNN robustness—experimentally surpassing that of classical neural networks of comparable size. This work establishes foundational methodology and empirical benchmarks for assessing and enhancing adversarial robustness in near-term quantum machine learning models.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Quantum machine learning (QML) models, like their classical counterparts, are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, hindering their secure deployment. Here, we report the first systematic experimental robustness benchmark for 20-qubit quantum neural network (QNN) classifiers executed on a superconducting processor. Our benchmarking framework features an efficient adversarial attack algorithm designed for QNNs, enabling quantitative characterization of adversarial robustness and robustness bounds. From our analysis, we verify that adversarial training reduces sensitivity to targeted perturbations by regularizing input gradients, significantly enhancing QNN's robustness. Additionally, our analysis reveals that QNNs exhibit superior adversarial robustness compared to classical neural networks, an advantage attributed to inherent quantum noise. Furthermore, the empirical upper bound extracted from our attack experiments shows a minimal deviation ($3 imes 10^{-3}$) from the theoretical lower bound, providing strong experimental confirmation of the attack's effectiveness and the tightness of fidelity-based robustness bounds. This work establishes a critical experimental framework for assessing and improving quantum adversarial robustness, paving the way for secure and reliable QML applications.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Assessing adversarial robustness of quantum neural networks
Comparing QNN robustness to classical neural networks
Validating theoretical robustness bounds experimentally
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Efficient adversarial attack algorithm for QNNs
Adversarial training reduces perturbation sensitivity
QNNs show superior robustness to classical networks
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
H
Hai-Feng Zhang
Laboratory of Quantum Information, School of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, P . R. China
Z
Zhao-Yun Chen
Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Hefei Comprehensive National Science Center, Hefei, Anhui, 230088, P . R. China
P
Peng Wang
Laboratory of Quantum Information, School of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, P . R. China
L
Liang-Liang Guo
Laboratory of Quantum Information, School of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, P . R. China
T
Tian-Le Wang
Laboratory of Quantum Information, School of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, P . R. China
X
Xiao-Yan Yang
Laboratory of Quantum Information, School of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, P . R. China
R
Ren-Ze Zhao
Laboratory of Quantum Information, School of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, P . R. China
Z
Ze-An Zhao
Laboratory of Quantum Information, School of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, P . R. China
S
Sheng Zhang
Laboratory of Quantum Information, School of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, P . R. China
L
Lei Du
Laboratory of Quantum Information, School of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, P . R. China
H
Hao-Ran Tao
Laboratory of Quantum Information, School of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, P . R. China
Z
Zhi-Long Jia
Origin Quantum Computing, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, P . R. China
W
Wei-Cheng Kong
Origin Quantum Computing, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, P . R. China
H
Huan-Yu Liu
Laboratory of Quantum Information, School of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, P . R. China
A
Athanasios V. Vasilakos
Department of ICT and Center for AI Research, University of Agder (UiA), Jon Lilletuns vei 9, 4879 Grimstad, Norway
Y
Yang Yang
Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Hefei Comprehensive National Science Center, Hefei, Anhui, 230088, P . R. China; Anhui University, Hefei, Anhui, 230039, P . R. China
Yu-Chun Wu
Yu-Chun Wu
university of science and technology of China
quantum physics,quantum computing,quantum algorithm
Ji Guan
Ji Guan
Associate Professor, Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Quantum computation and information
P
Peng Duan
Laboratory of Quantum Information, School of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, P . R. China
G
Guo-Ping Guo
Laboratory of Quantum Information, School of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230026, P . R. China