🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the systemic evolution of wealth inequality—quantified by the Gini coefficient—in strategic multi-agent trading on realistic social networks, bridging a longstanding gap in complex networks and game theory where the Gini coefficient has been largely neglected. We propose the first framework that systematically integrates the Gini coefficient into iterative multi-agent game modeling, combining scale-free network topology, trust- and information-flow–driven transaction rules, and dynamic temporal tracking of Gini trajectories. A reproducible, distributed trading algorithm is designed to demonstrate the spontaneous emergence of inequality from simple local interactions and its robustness across diverse network topologies. Experiments on multiple real-world and synthetic networks reveal that minute initial structural differences induce substantial inequality divergence, while the underlying evolutionary dynamics exhibit topological universality—i.e., consistent inequality growth patterns irrespective of specific network instantiation.
📝 Abstract
Transactions are an important aspect of human social life, and represent dynamic flow of information, intangible values, such as trust, as well as monetary and social capital. Although much research has been conducted on the nature of transactions in fields ranging from the social sciences to game theory, the systemic effects of different types of agents transacting in real-world social networks (often following a scale-free distribution) are not fully understood. A particular systemic measure that has not received adequate attention in the complex networks and game theory communities, is the Gini Coefficient, which is widely used in economics to quantify and understand wealth inequality. In part, the problem is a lack of experimentation using a replicable algorithm and publicly available data. Motivated by this problem, this article proposes a model and simulation algorithm, based on game theory, for quantifying the evolution of inequality in complex networks of strategic agents. Our results shed light on several complex drivers of inequality, even in simple, abstract settings, and exhibit consistency across networks with different origins and descriptions.