When Structured Sparse Autoencoders Learn Consistent Concepts Across Modalities

📅 2026-07-09
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenge that sparse autoencoders in current vision-language models struggle to learn cross-modal consistent concepts, particularly suffering from fragmented visual representations. To overcome this, the authors propose the Structured Sparse Autoencoder (S²AE), which uniquely integrates semantic attention similarity with spatial proximity to group image patches. S²AE further introduces structured sparsity regularization—combining group sparsity and exclusive sparsity—to enforce intra-group conceptual consistency and inter-group disentanglement. Evaluated on Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct, the method achieves a 6.06% improvement in mIoU, reduces the l₀ norm to 60.81, explains over 99% of variance, and enhances cross-modal semantic consistency and neuron monosemanticity by 3.08% and 2.37%, respectively.
📝 Abstract
Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have emerged as a promising technique for mechanistic interpretability by learning a set of sparse latent features in large models, each of which encodes a distinct concept. However, in vision-language models (VLMs), vanilla SAEs struggle to learn modality-consistent concepts, with concepts often exhibiting fragmented coverage (i.e., disjoint regions) in the visual modality. To address this challenge, we propose a Structured Sparse AutoEncoder ($S^2AE$) that enforces concept consistency from both semantic and spatial perspectives in the visual modality. Specifically, we group image patches based on Transformer attention similarity and spatial proximity, and introduce a structured sparsity regularization when training the vanilla SAE. The regularization consists of exclusive sparsity for inter-group concept disentanglement and group sparsity for intra-group concept consistency, which drives the latent neurons by SAEs to specialize in distinct, semantically grounded concepts. Evaluated on the \texttt{Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct} model, the method achieves 6.06% average improvement in semantic alignment (mIoU) and 60.81 in representational efficiency (lower l0 norm) while maintaining near-perfect reconstruction fidelity with an Explained Variance above 99%. Cross-modal analysis further demonstrates that $S^2AE$ enhances neuronal monosemanticity by this visual structural prior, achieving a 3.08% average gain in semantic consistency and a 2.37% average gain in monosemanticity scores for both modalities of multimodal features, thereby fostering more coherent and disentangled representations.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

structured sparse autoencoders
modality-consistent concepts
vision-language models
concept fragmentation
cross-modal interpretability
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Structured Sparse Autoencoder
modality-consistent concepts
structured sparsity regularization
neuronal monosemanticity
vision-language models