Systematic Evaluation of Learning Rate Scheduling Strategies Across Heterogeneous Architectures

📅 2026-07-09
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Learning rate scheduling strategies significantly influence neural network performance, yet their selection typically relies on extensive manual trial and error. This work presents the first large-scale, systematic quantification of scheduler effectiveness across heterogeneous architectures. Leveraging the LEMUR dataset, we evaluate 25 configurations from nine PyTorch learning rate schedulers on 30 diverse convolutional and Transformer architectures, training a total of 3,938 model variants through automated source-code instrumentation. Our results reveal strong dependencies between scheduler choice and model architecture, with CosineAnnealingWarmRestarts and CyclicLR substantially outperforming conventional decay strategies. The best-performing configuration achieves a Top-1 accuracy of 86.45%, and 237 variants exceed 80% accuracy. All results are publicly released to support community research.
📝 Abstract
Choosing a learning rate scheduling strategy is critical to neural network training, but manual selection is costly and rarely exhaustive. While classical AutoML approaches often treat the scheduler as a secondary hyperparameter, we systematically investigate its impact on classification accuracy across a diverse pool of architectures. We evaluated 30 representative architectures from convolutional and transformer families within the LEMUR neural network dataset. Through automated source-code injection, we applied 25 scheduler configurations across nine PyTorch families, evaluating a total of 3,938 model variants on CIFAR-10. Our best configuration achieved a top-1 accuracy of 86.45%, with 237 variants exceeding 80%. The results show that the choice of scheduler depends heavily on the architecture: CosineAnnealingWarmRestarts and CyclicLR consistently outperform basic decay strategies. The resulting accuracy landscape, contributed to the LEMUR nn-dataset, provides a practical reference for principled scheduler selection.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

learning rate scheduling
neural network architectures
classification accuracy
heterogeneous architectures
scheduler selection
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

learning rate scheduling
heterogeneous architectures
systematic evaluation
automated source-code injection
LEMUR dataset
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.