Distributionally Faithful Imputation via Positive Semi-Definite Kernel Density Estimation

📅 2026-07-08
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Missing values severely undermine statistical inference and machine learning, yet existing imputation methods often rely on heuristics or strong parametric assumptions that neglect the joint data distribution. This work reframes imputation under missing completely at random (MCAR) as a density estimation problem from masked observations, requiring that the marginal distribution over observed entries matches the empirical distribution. Building on positive semi-definite (PSD) kernels, we introduce a convex empirical risk minimization framework and propose the first unified density model capable of both single and multiple imputation, with provable statistical consistency. The method achieves an adaptive excess risk convergence rate that mitigates the curse of dimensionality in high-dimensional settings. Experiments on one synthetic and eleven real-world datasets demonstrate substantial improvements over state-of-the-art baselines in distributional fidelity, highlighting its strong practical potential.
📝 Abstract
Missing values undermine statistical inference and machine learning pipelines, yet most imputation methods rely on heuristics or restrictive parametric assumptions that ignore the joint data distribution. We recast imputation under missing completely at random (MCAR) as density estimation from masked observations: estimate a distribution whose observed marginals exactly match those in the data. Leveraging positive semi definite (PSD) kernel densities we obtain a convex empirical risk problem with closed form marginals, solvable by a Newton interior point method. The resulting PSD Impute model yields both single and multiple imputations from the same fitted density, enjoys statistical consistency with fast adaptive excess risk beating the curse of dimensionality for very regular probabilities. Preliminary experiments on one synthetic and eleven real world datasets already indicate competitive distributional accuracy compared with popular imputation baselines, suggesting strong practical promise.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

missing data imputation
distributional fidelity
density estimation
MCAR
joint distribution
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

distributionally faithful imputation
positive semi-definite kernel density estimation
missing completely at random
convex empirical risk
adaptive excess risk