Pricing Discrete and Nonlinear Markets With Semidefinite Relaxations

📅 2026-02-17
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenge of efficient marginal pricing in non-convex electricity markets characterized by discrete decisions and nonlinear constraints, which often necessitate out-of-market subsidies. The authors propose a novel approach that integrates semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxation with the envelope theorem to derive marginal price signals from the dual variables of the relaxed problem, offering theoretical guarantees on their economic coherence. The associated opportunity cost is rigorously bounded by the SDP relaxation gap. The method is applicable to non-convex market models incorporating both DC and AC unit commitment formulations. Numerical experiments on IEEE benchmark instances demonstrate that the proposed pricing mechanism reduces average opportunity costs by 46% compared to conventional fixed-binary pricing schemes, while the SDP relaxation is typically tight in practice.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Nonconvexities in markets with discrete decisions and nonlinear constraints make efficient pricing challenging, often necessitating subsidies. A prime example is the unit commitment (UC) problem in electricity markets, where costly subsidies are commonly required. We propose a new pricing scheme for nonconvex markets with both discreteness and nonlinearity, by convexifying nonconvex structures through a semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxation and deriving prices from the relaxation's dual variables. When the choice set is bounded, we establish strong duality for the SDP, which allows us to extend the envelope theorem to the value function of the relaxation. This extension yields a marginal price signal for demand, which we use as our pricing mechanism. We demonstrate that under certain conditions-for instance, when the relaxation's right hand sides are linear in demand-the resulting lost opportunity cost is bounded by the relaxation's optimality gap. This result highlights the importance of achieving tight relaxations. The proposed framework applies to nonconvex electricity market problems, including for both direct current and alternating current UC. Our numerical experiments indicate that the SDP relaxations are often tight, reinforcing the effectiveness of the proposed pricing scheme. Across a suite of IEEE benchmark instances, the lost opportunity cost under our pricing scheme is, on average, 46% lower than that of the commonly used fixed-binary pricing scheme.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

nonconvex markets
discrete decisions
nonlinear constraints
pricing
unit commitment
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

semidefinite programming
nonconvex pricing
unit commitment
strong duality
envelope theorem
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
C
Cheng Guo
School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina
L
Lauren Henderson
School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina
Ryan Cory-Wright
Ryan Cory-Wright
Imperial Business School
Operations ResearchOptimizationMachine LearningAnalyticsElectricity Markets
B
Boshi Yang
School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina