Common Belief Revisited

๐Ÿ“… 2026-02-17
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
This work resolves a long-standing open problem in multi-agent systems concerning the complete axiomatization of common belief when individual beliefs are modeled by the KD45 logic. Through a careful semantic analysis within modal logic and the construction of an appropriate axiomatic system, the study demonstrates that, in addition to the shift-reflexivity axiom, a novel axiom dependent on the number of agents is required. This leads to the first complete axiomatization of common belief over KD45, thereby establishing its precise logical characterization and settling a key question in the field.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Contrary to common belief, common belief is not KD4. If individual belief is KD45, common belief does indeed lose the 5 property and keep the D and 4 properties -- and it has none of the other commonly considered properties of knowledge and belief. But it has another property: $C(Cฯ†\rightarrow ฯ†)$ -- corresponding to so-called shift-reflexivity (reflexivity one step ahead). This observation begs the question: is KD4 extended with this axiom a complete characterisation of common belief in the KD45 case? If not, what \emph{is} the logic of common belief? In this paper we show that the answer to the first question is ``no'': there is one additional axiom, and, furthermore, it relies on the number of agents. We show that the result is a complete characterisation of common belief, settling the open problem.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

common belief
KD45
axiomatization
multi-agent logic
shift-reflexivity
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

common belief
KD45
axiomatization
shift-reflexivity
multi-agent logic
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.