π€ AI Summary
This work addresses the erosion of TypeScriptβs static guarantees caused by the pervasive use of the `any` type in function decorators within dynamic languages. We propose the F<:DR calculus, which introduces domain (Dom(T)) and range (Range(T)) projection types to enable precise type checking for arbitrary function calls while preserving compatibility with System F<:. The approach supports lightweight parametric polymorphism, allowing safe expression of higher-order function patterns without resorting to unsafe `any` types. Leveraging logical relations and a path-selection mechanism, we formalize and prove the semantic type safety of F<:DR in Rocq. Moreover, the design naturally extends to other projection scenarios, such as product types.
π Abstract
Dynamic languages such as Python and JavaScript widely use function decorators to extend behavior. In TypeScript, a common way to type such patterns uses Parameters<T> and ReturnType<T>. In practice, this idiom relies on a function-type bound for T that is expressed using the unsafe type any, which weakens static guarantees. At the core is a standard typing principle: application is justified only when the callee is exposed as an arrow type.
We present F<:DR, a calculus that adds domain and range projection types, Dom(T) and Range(T), for arbitrary types T. These projections permit typing applications through abstract function types: an argument of type Dom(T) witnesses callability, and the result is typed as Range(T). This design complements, rather than replaces, standard arrow-based application, which remains admissible via subtyping in System F<:.
We mechanize F<:DR in Rocq and prove semantic type soundness using logical relations with path selection, which delays projection interpretation until function structure is resolved. The same technique extends to additional projection types, illustrated for primitive pairs, i.e., product types.