🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge teachers face in highly heterogeneous classrooms when attempting to simultaneously account for students’ academic performance, motivational states, and specific learning needs—such as dyslexia or attention deficits—in delivering differentiated instruction. To this end, we propose the first teacher-in-the-loop multi-agent AI framework that unifies modeling of motivation, academic achievement, and learning differences. The framework comprises four coordinated agents: learner simulation, diagnostic assessment, instructional material generation, and efficacy evaluation, all designed to support teacher-led differentiated instruction. Integrating multi-agent systems, learner modeling, generative AI, and human-AI collaboration, the system demonstrated high practical utility in evaluations by 70 K–12 in-service teachers, while needs-validation workshops with 30 school principals further confirmed its urgency and feasibility in real-world educational settings.
📝 Abstract
Classrooms are becoming increasingly heterogeneous, comprising learners with diverse performance and motivation levels, language proficiencies, and learning differences such as dyslexia and ADHD. While teachers recognize the need for differentiated instruction, growing workloads create substantial barriers, making differentiated instruction an ideal that is often unrealized in practice. Current AI educational tools, which promise differentiated materials, are predominantly student-facing and performance-centric, ignoring other aspects that shape learning outcomes. We introduce FACET, a teacher-facing multi-agent framework designed to address these gaps by supporting differentiation that accounts for motivation, performance, and learning differences. Developed with educational stakeholders from the outset, the framework coordinates four specialized agents, including learner simulation, diagnostic assessment, material generation, and evaluation within a teacher-in-the-loop design. School principals (N = 30) shaped system requirements through participatory workshops, while in-service K-12 teachers (N = 70) evaluated material quality. Mixed-methods evaluation demonstrates strong perceived value for inclusive differentiation. Practitioners emphasized both the urgent need arising from classroom heterogeneity and the importance of maintaining pedagogical autonomy as a prerequisite for adoption. We discuss implications for future school deployment and outline partnerships for longitudinal classroom implementation.