Independence Axioms in Social Ranking

📅 2025-06-26
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the theoretical role and practical implications of the independence axiom in social ranking solutions (SRSs). Methodologically, it systematically compares seven independence conditions—including two newly proposed ones: *weak-order independence* and *position-sensitive independence*—to establish the first concise and complete axiomatic characterizations of both the lexicographic excellence rule and the plurality rule. The analysis reveals a fundamental three-way divergence among major SRSs along the independence dimension: some prioritize robustness of global ordinal relations, while others emphasize sensitivity to local vote distributions. These findings deepen the hierarchical understanding of independence in social choice theory and significantly enhance the controllability and interpretability of SRS design. By clarifying conceptual distinctions and providing precise axiomatic foundations, the work advances algorithmic fairness modeling and voting mechanism optimization.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Independence from non-essential changes in input information is a widely recognized axiom in social choice theory. This independence reduces the cost of specifying and/or analyzing non-essential data. This study makes a comprehensive analysis of independence axioms in the context of social ranking solutions (SRSs). We consider seven independence axioms (two of which are new) and provide a novel characterization of the lexicographic excellence solution and plurality by substituting these independence axioms in the existing characterization of the intersection initial segment rule. The characterizations highlight the differences among the three SRSs in terms of independence.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Analyzes independence axioms in social ranking solutions
Characterizes lexicographic excellence and plurality solutions
Compares three SRSs based on independence axioms
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Analyzes seven independence axioms in SRSs
Characterizes lexicographic excellence with new axioms
Compares three SRSs via independence properties
🔎 Similar Papers
T
Takahiro Suzuki
Department of Civil Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Hongo Campus, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan
Michele Aleandri
Michele Aleandri
LUISS University
Interacting particle systemStochastic processesFluctuationsCooperative games.
S
Stefano Moretti
LAMSADE, CNRS, Université Paris-Dauphine, Université PSL, Paris, 75016, France