Interpretation, Learning, and Empathy as One Constraint: A Residual-Adequacy Architecture with Accountable Abstention

2026-05-24

AI Summary

This work proposes a compact cognitive architecture that unifies the modeling of an agent’s cognitive limitations in explanation, learning, and empathy through a single scalar residual signal driving explanation, decision-making, and accountable refusal behaviors. The framework integrates three modes of cognitive failure into a residual-sufficiency constraint, combining an explanation-decision unit, a family of local representational schemes, and a description-length-driven expansion strategy to enable honest responses to novel situations. The architecture is theoretically proven to be total, deterministic, and guaranteed to terminate uniquely within finitely many steps. Empirical evaluations reproduce three hallmark phenomena—“unknown-type” responses, “bounded empathy,” and “developmental prerequisites”—and yield falsifiable predictions. Notably, this is the first implementation of a typed, witness-augmented, and accountable abandonment mechanism.

Abstract

An agent must act on the situation before it, learn what it cannot yet represent, and model other agents well enough to coordinate. These faculties are usually realized by separate mechanisms, yet they share a failure mode: the situation can exceed what the agent can currently represent, and the honest response is then a principled refusal that says what was missing. We develop a small cognitive architecture in which these limits arise from a single quantity. An Interpretation-Decision Unit (IDU) interprets a content vector through a family of regimes - local representational frames with private bases - and decides which actions it licenses; a scalar residual of the content against the active regimes' representational scope drives the unit. Low residual with a clean licensing emits an action; otherwise the unit re-interprets, attempts a description-length-justified expansion, or halts with a typed, witnessed terminal. We prove the unit is total and deterministic: for any content and fixed configuration it halts in finitely many bounded-cost steps with a unique terminal witness, so abstention carries its cause by construction. By binding the architecture's open parameters without changing its mechanics, the same residual-against-scope constraint recovers three documented phenomena at three scopes: the typology of not-knowing (typed abstention); a forced misunderstanding between agents, localized to one shared concept and invisible to the agent committing it (bounded empathy); and prerequisite dependence in learning derived from a bounded focus window rather than posited (developmental prerequisites). Each instantiation is worked for a natural and an artificial agent and states a falsifiable prediction, so one constraint can model limits in both human and machine cognition. The account contributes a unification and a notion of accountable abstention, typed and witnessed by construction.

Problem

• abstention
• interpretation
• learning
• empathy
• representational limits

Innovation

• residual-adequacy architecture
• accountable abstention
• interpretation-decision unit
• bounded empathy
• developmental prerequisites