Plume Segmentation from MethaneSAT with Cross-Sensor Transfer Learning and Physics-Informed Postprocessing

📅 2026-05-22
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenges of scarce annotated data and unreliable inference under complex environmental conditions in detecting methane plumes from MethaneSAT satellite imagery. To this end, the authors propose a dual-mode detection framework that integrates cross-sensor transfer learning with physics-informed post-processing. Built upon a Mask R-CNN architecture with a ResNet-50 backbone, the model is pretrained using MethaneAIR and synthetic data, then refined through physically constrained post-processing steps—including morphological filtering, spatial proximity merging, and distribution-based classification—to enable robust emission source identification under both high-sensitivity and high-precision operating modes. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves an instance-level recall of 0.98 on MethaneSAT data, with precision/recall of 0.71/0.94 in high-sensitivity mode and 0.92/0.70 in high-precision mode, substantially enhancing both detection performance and practical applicability.
📝 Abstract
Automated detection and masking of individual methane plumes from satellite imagery is important for operational emission attribution and quantification. We present a machine learning framework for plume detection from MethaneSAT retrieved column-averaged dry-air mole fractions of methane. We address two core challenges: the scarcity of labeled MethaneSAT data and the need for inference reliability across diverse atmospheric and surface conditions. We first demonstrate that Mask R-CNN with a ResNet-50 backbone outperforms U-Net semantic segmentation on both MethaneAIR (an airborne version of MethaneSAT) and MethaneSAT data, with pixel-level F1 score gains of 10.49 and 5.48 respectively. To address MethaneSAT data scarcity, we evaluate three cross-sensor transfer strategies leveraging MethaneAIR flights and synthetic plumes. Mask R-CNN with ResNet-50 fine-tuned from MethaneAIR pre-trained weights is the most effective strategy, achieving instance-level precision of 0.60 and a near-perfect recall of 0.98 at the baseline operating point. A physics-informed post-processing pipeline converts detections into two operationally distinct modes. The first is a high-sensitivity mode that applies morphological filtering and proximity-based merging for comprehensive emission screening, achieving precision of 0.71 and recall of 0.94. The second is a high-precision mode that additionally applies a distribution-based classifier for confident source attribution, achieving precision of 0.92 and recall of 0.70. Manual review of detections classified as false positives against our wavelet-based ground truth labels reveals that a meaningful fraction of cases correspond to real methane enhancements excluded by conservative labeling criteria, indicating that precision values reported are lower bounds on true detection performance... Our data and code are available at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/FR959H
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

plume segmentation
methane detection
satellite imagery
data scarcity
emission attribution
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

cross-sensor transfer learning
physics-informed postprocessing
Mask R-CNN
methane plume segmentation
MethaneSAT
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
M
Manuel PĂŠrez-Carrasco
Center for Astrophysics|Harvard & Smithsonian, Cambridge, MA
M
Maya Nasr
Environmental Defense Fund, Washington, D.C., USA; Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Zhan Zhang
Zhan Zhang
Associate Professor, Pace University
Human Computer InteractionComputer Supported Cooperative WorkHealthcare InformaticsHuman-AI
A
Apisada Chulakadabba
Professorship of Environmental Sensing and Modeling, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
J
Javier Roger
Research Institute of Water and Environmental Engineering (IIAMA), Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain; Institute of Environmental Physics (IUP), University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
R
Raia Ottenheimer
John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
S
SĂŠbastien Roche
Environmental Defense Fund, Washington, D.C., USA; Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
M
Maryann Sargent
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
C
Chris Chan Miller
Environmental Defense Fund, Washington, D.C., USA; Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
D
Daniel Varon
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, USA; Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA, USA
J
Jack Warren
Environmental Defense Fund, Washington, D.C., USA
L
Luis Guanter
Research Institute of Water and Environmental Engineering (IIAMA), Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain
K
Kang Sun
Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
J
Jonathan Franklin
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
J
Jia Chen
Professorship of Environmental Sensing and Modeling, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
C
Cecilia Garraffo
Center for Astrophysics|Harvard & Smithsonian, Cambridge, MA
X
Xiong Liu
Center for Astrophysics|Harvard & Smithsonian, Cambridge, MA
Ritesh Gautam
Ritesh Gautam
Environmental Defense Fund (previously at NASA GSFC and IIT Bombay)
Satellite Remote SensingEarth ObservationMethane EmissionsAerosols
Steven Wofsy
Steven Wofsy
Harvard University
Atmospheric chemistryatmosphere-biosphere exchangeclimate change