"I Felt Bad After We Ignored Her": Understanding How Interface-Driven Social Prominence Shapes Group Discussions with GenAI

📅 2026-02-16
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the underexplored role of interface design in shaping how generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) influences group interaction within multi-party video conversations. Proposing a “interface-driven social salience” perspective, the work introduces a GenAI agent capable of participating in spoken dialogue and implements three collaborative modes to modulate its presence and user control. Through an integrated generative dialogue system, seamless video conferencing, and a mixed-methods experiment with 18 dyads in a within-subjects design, findings reveal that the social salience of GenAI significantly reshapes communication patterns, distribution of speaking turns, and collective negotiation of its influence. This research pioneers the integration of social salience into human-AI collaborative interface design, demonstrating how interface configurations shape human perceptions and interactions with AI, and culminates in design principles to support effective coordination and critical engagement in human-AI hybrid groups.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Recent advancements in the conversational and social capabilities of generative AI (GenAI) have sparked interest in its role as an agent capable of actively participating in human-AI group discussions. Despite this momentum, we don't fully understand how GenAI shapes conversational dynamics or how the interface design impacts its influence on the group. In this paper, we introduce interface-driven social prominence as a design lens for collaborative GenAI systems. We then present a GenAI-based conversational agent that can actively engage in spoken dialogue during video calls and design three distinct collaboration modes that vary the social prominence of the agent by manipulating its presence in the shared space and the degree of control users have over its participation. A mixed-methods within-subjects study, in which 18 dyads engaged in realistic discussions with a GenAI agent, offers empirical insights into how communication patterns and the collective negotiation of GenAI's influence shift based on how it is embedded into the collaborative experience. Based on these findings, we outline design implications for supporting the coordination and critical engagement required in human-AI groups.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

generative AI
social prominence
group discussion
interface design
conversational dynamics
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

interface-driven social prominence
generative AI
collaborative systems
conversational agent
human-AI group interaction
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
J
Janet G. Johnson
University of Michigan
R
Ruijie Sophia Huang
University of Michigan
Khoa Nguyen
Khoa Nguyen
University of Wollongong, Australia
Cryptography
J
Ji Young Nam
University of Michigan
Michael Nebeling
Michael Nebeling
University of Michigan
human-computer interactionmixed reality