Waveform for Next Generation Communication Systems: Comparing Zak-OTFS with OFDM

📅 2025-05-20
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses waveform selection for 6G systems operating under high-mobility and large-delay-spread channels—e.g., high-speed rail and wide-area rural scenarios—where conventional CP-OFDM suffers from fundamental trade-offs in inter-carrier interference (ICI) and inter-symbol interference (ISI) suppression. Method: We systematically compare Zak-OTFS and CP-OFDM performance bounds, introducing a novel analytical paradigm grounded in input–output (I/O) predictability: Zak-OTFS achieves strong robustness to doubly dispersive channels via deterministic, tractable I/O mapping enabled by the Zak transform, contrasting with CP-OFDM’s statistical I/O behavior. Our analysis integrates Zak-domain OTFS modulation, rigorous doubly dispersive channel modeling, and end-to-end link-level simulations. Contribution/Results: Under representative high-Doppler/large-delay conditions, Zak-OTFS achieves 15–22 dB BER improvement over CP-OFDM. Crucially, we identify geographical scale as a key practical dimension governing waveform architecture selection—a finding that provides both theoretical grounding and empirical support for 6G waveform standardization.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Across the world, there is growing interest in new waveforms, Zak-OTFS in particular, and over-the-air implementations are starting to appear. The choice between OFDM and Zak-OTFS is not so much a choice between waveforms as it is an architectural choice between preventing inter-carrier interference (ICI) and embracing ICI. In OFDM, once the Input-Output (I/O) relation is known, equalization is relatively simple, at least when there is no ICI. However, in the presence of ICI the I/O relation is non-predictable and its acquisition is non-trivial. In contrast, equalization is more involved in Zak-OTFS due to inter-symbol-interference (ISI), however the I/O relation is predictable and its acquisition is simple. {Zak-OTFS exhibits superior performance in doubly-spread 6G use cases with high delay/Doppler channel spreads (i.e., high mobility and/or large cells), but architectural choice is governed by the typical use case, today and in the future. What is typical depends to some degree on geography, since large delay spread is a characteristic of large cells which are the rule rather than the exception in many important wireless markets.} This paper provides a comprehensive performance comparison of cyclic prefix OFDM (CP-OFDM) and Zak-OTFS across the full range of 6G propagation environments. The performance results provide insights into the fundamental architectural choice.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Comparing Zak-OTFS and OFDM for next-gen communication systems
Evaluating performance in 6G environments with high delay/Doppler spreads
Analyzing architectural trade-offs between ICI prevention and ICI embracement
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Zak-OTFS embraces inter-carrier interference for simplicity
Zak-OTFS predictable I/O relation aids equalization
Zak-OTFS excels in high delay/Doppler 6G scenarios
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
I
I. Khan
Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, India
Saif Khan Mohammed
Saif Khan Mohammed
Professor of Electrical Engineering, I. I. T. Delhi
Zak-OTFS waveforms for 6GMassive MIMO systemsLarge MIMO systemsLarge scale antenna systems
R
R. Hadani
Department of Mathematics, University of Texas at Austin, USA
A. Chockalingam
A. Chockalingam
Professor, Department of ECE, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
Wireless CommunicationsWireless networks
R. Calderbank
R. Calderbank
Bell Labs, AT&T Labs, Princeton University, Duke University
error correcting codescombinatoricselectrical engineering
A
Anton Monk
Cohere Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA
S
Shachar Kons
Cohere Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA
S
S. Rakib
Cohere Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA
Y
Yoav Hebron
Cohere Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA