End-to-end Cortical Surface Reconstruction from Clinical Magnetic Resonance Images

📅 2025-05-20
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Current cortical surface reconstruction tools require high-resolution (≥1 mm) and specific-contrast (e.g., T1-weighted) MRI scans, limiting generalizability to heterogeneous clinical acquisitions. To address this, we propose the first end-to-end, retraining-free explicit cortical reconstruction method adaptable to arbitrary clinical MR sequences—including multi-contrast, anisotropic, and low-resolution data. Our approach leverages synthetically domain-randomized training data, integrates differentiable template mesh deformation, and employs a two-stage joint estimation of white-matter and gray-matter surfaces—ensuring strict topological correctness. Evaluated on ADNI and a real-world clinical cohort of 1,332 subjects, our method reduces cortical thickness estimation error by 50% compared to recon-all-clinical (0.50 → 0.24 mm). It achieves significantly improved accuracy, robustly recapitulates age-related cortical thinning patterns, and demonstrates both computational robustness and biological validity.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Surface-based cortical analysis is valuable for a variety of neuroimaging tasks, such as spatial normalization, parcellation, and gray matter (GM) thickness estimation. However, most tools for estimating cortical surfaces work exclusively on scans with at least 1 mm isotropic resolution and are tuned to a specific magnetic resonance (MR) contrast, often T1-weighted (T1w). This precludes application using most clinical MR scans, which are very heterogeneous in terms of contrast and resolution. Here, we use synthetic domain-randomized data to train the first neural network for explicit estimation of cortical surfaces from scans of any contrast and resolution, without retraining. Our method deforms a template mesh to the white matter (WM) surface, which guarantees topological correctness. This mesh is further deformed to estimate the GM surface. We compare our method to recon-all-clinical (RAC), an implicit surface reconstruction method which is currently the only other tool capable of processing heterogeneous clinical MR scans, on ADNI and a large clinical dataset (n=1,332). We show a approximately 50 % reduction in cortical thickness error (from 0.50 to 0.24 mm) with respect to RAC and better recovery of the aging-related cortical thinning patterns detected by FreeSurfer on high-resolution T1w scans. Our method enables fast and accurate surface reconstruction of clinical scans, allowing studies (1) with sample sizes far beyond what is feasible in a research setting, and (2) of clinical populations that are difficult to enroll in research studies. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/simnibs/brainnet.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Reconstruct cortical surfaces from diverse clinical MR scans
Overcome limitations of contrast and resolution variability
Improve accuracy and speed for clinical neuroimaging studies
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Uses synthetic domain-randomized data for training
Deforms template mesh for topological correctness
Processes heterogeneous clinical MR scans without retraining
J
J. D. Nielsen
Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital – Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
Karthik Gopinath
Karthik Gopinath
Postdoctoral Research Fellow @ Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School
Medical Image AnalysisMachine Learning
A
Andrew Hoopes
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA; Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
A
Adrian V. Dalca
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA; Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
C
C. Magdamo
Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
S
Steve Arnold
Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
Sudeshna Das
Sudeshna Das
Associate Prof. of Neurology Harvard Medical School
Bioinformatics
A
A. Thielscher
Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital – Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
J
J. E. Iglesias
Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA; Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Hawkes Institute, University College London, London, UK
O
O. Puonti
Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital – Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA