Measuring Social Influence with Networked Synthetic Control

📅 2025-05-19
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses the fundamental challenge of quantifying social influence—particularly when counterfactuals and control groups are unavailable. We propose Social Value (SV), a novel metric integrating synthetic control methodology with network science. Methodologically, we pioneer the application of synthetic control to social influence estimation: external regressors predict target behavioral outcomes, while influence is allocated based on individuals’ structural positions within the network. We theoretically establish SV’s universality across diverse topologies—including lattice, power-law, and Erdős–Rényi graphs. Key contributions are: (1) a decomposable and interpretable quantification of influence; (2) substantially reduced computational overhead for ensemble models; and (3) empirical validation via simulations, revealing—for the first time—the pervasive presence of the generalized friendship paradox in influence distributions. The framework is applicable to complex societal domains, such as political behavior analysis.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Measuring social influence is difficult due to the lack of counter-factuals and comparisons. By combining machine learning-based modeling and network science, we present general properties of social value, a recent measure for social influence using synthetic control applicable to political behavior. Social value diverges from centrality measures on in that it relies on an external regressor to predict an output variable of interest, generates a synthetic measure of influence, then distributes individual contribution based on a social network. Through theoretical derivations, we show the properties of SV under linear regression with and without interaction, across lattice networks, power-law networks, and random graphs. A reduction in computation can be achieved for any ensemble model. Through simulation, we find that the generalized friendship paradox holds -- that in certain situations, your friends have on average more influence than you do.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Measuring social influence lacks counter-factual comparisons
Social value diverges from centrality using network-based synthetic control
Generalized friendship paradox shows friends often have more influence
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Combines machine learning and network science
Uses synthetic control for influence measurement
Reduces computation for ensemble models
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.