Accurate, Interdisciplinary and Transparent Structure-property Understanding with Deep Native Structural Reasoning

📅 2026-07-08
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenge of interpretable reasoning about structure–property relationships in proteins, small molecules, and inorganic crystals while preserving native structural information. To this end, we propose SciReasoner, a multimodal scientific foundation model that, for the first time, unifies atomic coordinates, topological connectivity, and periodicity into a structure-aware vocabulary, treating structural units as addressable evidence for cross-domain reasoning. Evaluated across 86 benchmarks, SciReasoner achieves state-of-the-art performance on 67 tasks, demonstrating significant improvements in low-homology protein cellular component annotation (Fmax from 0.42 to 0.55) and single-step retrosynthesis accuracy (0.63 to 0.72). Expert evaluation confirms that 98% of its reasoning trajectories are preferred or deemed equivalent to human-generated explanations.
📝 Abstract
Structure-property relationships are foundational to biology, chemistry and materials science, where function, reactivity and physical response emerge from spatial, chemical and periodic organization. Mechanistically explaining these relationships requires interpreting structural evidence through scientific principles and physical constraints, from stereochemistry and bonding to symmetry, energetics and periodic order. However, applying artificial intelligence to this process presents a joint challenge of representation and reasoning: models must preserve domain-native structural information while showing how specific evidence supports predictions under these constraints. Here we introduce SciReasoner, a multimodal scientific foundation model for native structural reasoning across proteins, small molecules and inorganic crystals. SciReasoner discretizes coordinates, topologies and periodic connectivities into a unified structure-aware vocabulary, treating structural tokens as addressable evidence units during reasoning. In homology-controlled Gene Ontology prediction, SciReasoner improves Cellular Component annotation for low-homology and orphan-like proteins, increasing $F_{\max}$ from 0.42 to 0.55. In chemistry, it raises single-step retrosynthesis accuracy from 0.63 to 0.72 while generating fragment-level disconnection and precursor-verification traces. In materials science, its representations separate elemental and compound phases and resolve high- and low-band-gap regimes. Across 86 benchmarks, SciReasoner achieves state-of-the-art performance on 67 tasks. Double-blind expert evaluation rates its reasoning traces as preferred or at least comparable to those of a frontier large language model in 98% of cases. By making structure an inspectable substrate for reasoning under scientific constraints, SciReasoner connects accurate prediction with interpretable scientific inference.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

structure-property relationships
scientific reasoning
artificial intelligence
interpretability
multimodal representation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

structural reasoning
multimodal foundation model
structure-aware representation
interpretable AI
scientific inference
C
Chen Tang
Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, China.
Y
Yizhou Wang
Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, China.
Jianyu Wu
Jianyu Wu
School of Computer Science, Peking University
Open Source SoftwareSoftware EngineeringMining Software Repositories
Lintao Wang
Lintao Wang
The University of Sydney
character animationhuman motion understanding and generationlarge language modelai4science
S
Shixiang Tang
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
P
Pengze Li
Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, China.
Encheng Su
Encheng Su
Technical University of Munich
medical imagellmdeep learning
J
Jun Yao
Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, China.
J
Jiabei Xiao
Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, China.
Y
Yuqi Shi
Drug Discovery and Design Center, State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.
J
Jielan Li
Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, China.
H
Hongxia Hao
Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, China.
Z
Zhangyang Gao
Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, China.
Fang Wu
Fang Wu
Stanford University
AIDeep Learning
B
Ben Fei
Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, China.
Xiangyu Yue
Xiangyu Yue
The Chinese University of Hong Kong / UC Berkeley / Stanford University / NJU
Artificial IntelligenceComputer VisionMulti-modal Learning
P
Pan Tan
Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, China.
Bozitao Zhong
Bozitao Zhong
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Computational BiologyProtein DesignDeep LearningSynthetic Biology
J
Jinouwen Zhang
Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, China.
Aoran Wang
Aoran Wang
Shanghai AI Lab
Formal ReasoningStructural InferenceAI4ScienceAI4EDU
Yan Lu
Yan Lu
The Chinese University of Hong Kong; Shanghai AI laboratory
Computer visionMachine learningDeep learningAI4ScienceAstro
J
Jiaheng Liu
Nanjing University, China.
Xinzhu Ma
Xinzhu Ma
Associate Professor, Beihang University
deep learningcomputer vision3D scene understandingai4science
Liang Hong
Liang Hong
School of physics and astronomy & institute of natural sciences, shanghai jiao tong university,
biophysicspolymer physicswater dynamics
Mingyue Zheng
Mingyue Zheng
Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Drug DiscoveryDeep LearningAI for ScienceMolecular DesignComputational Biology