Evaluation of Multilingual Ability to Use Spatial Deictic Expressions in Vision-Language Models

📅 2026-07-08
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge that current vision-language models struggle to accurately generate spatially grounded deictic expressions (e.g., “this,” “that”) in multilingual settings, largely due to insufficient modeling of language-specific spatial distinctions. To systematically evaluate this capability, the authors introduce the first benchmark encompassing four languages, leveraging controlled image–text pairings to assess how well models jointly reason about object distance and linguistic conventions when selecting appropriate demonstratives. The findings reveal that prevailing models significantly deviate from human-like behavior in both distance sensitivity and cross-linguistic expression patterns. By proposing a dedicated evaluation framework for multilingual spatial deixis, this work establishes a foundational methodology for a previously underexplored aspect of vision–language grounding.
📝 Abstract
One of the expected abilities of vision-language models (VLMs) is spatial reasoning ability based on a given text and image. To evaluate the spatial reasoning abilities of VLMs, we focus on the use of spatial deictic expressions, which are defined as spatial expressions whose referent is determined by their situational context, such as ``this'' and ``that''. To handle spatial deictic expressions, VLMs must jointly reason over language and visual space, grounding context-dependent references in the image's spatial structure. In addition, selecting appropriate spatial deictic expressions across languages requires VLMs to understand the language-specific spatial distinctions encoded by these expressions. In this paper, we develop a benchmark to evaluate the multilingual ability of VLMs to use spatial deictic expressions in four languages. Our experiments using this benchmark reveal that the tested models use demonstratives in a manner different from that of humans, particularly in selecting the appropriate demonstratives based on the distance to the object.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

spatial deictic expressions
vision-language models
multilingual evaluation
spatial reasoning
demonstratives
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

spatial deictic expressions
vision-language models
multilingual evaluation
spatial reasoning
demonstratives