QUEST: Quality-aware Semi-supervised Table Extraction for Business Documents

📅 2025-06-17
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
To address the challenges of sparse human annotations, multi-stage error accumulation, and unreliable pseudo-labels in commercial document table extraction (TE), this paper proposes a quality-aware semi-supervised framework. Methodologically, it introduces: (1) a novel F1-predictability assessment model grounded in structural and contextual modeling for fine-grained quality quantification; (2) a row- and column-level diversity sampling mechanism integrating Determinantal Point Processes (DPP), Vendi Score, and IntDiv to mitigate confirmation bias; and (3) an interpretable, robust quality-guided pseudo-label filtering strategy. Evaluated on a proprietary business dataset, the framework achieves an F1 score of 74% (+10 percentage points) and reduces empty-table false detection by 45%. On the DocILE benchmark, it attains an F1 score of 50% (+8 percentage points) and lowers empty-table prediction errors by 19%.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Automating table extraction (TE) from business documents is critical for industrial workflows but remains challenging due to sparse annotations and error-prone multi-stage pipelines. While semi-supervised learning (SSL) can leverage unlabeled data, existing methods rely on confidence scores that poorly reflect extraction quality. We propose QUEST, a Quality-aware Semi-supervised Table extraction framework designed for business documents. QUEST introduces a novel quality assessment model that evaluates structural and contextual features of extracted tables, trained to predict F1 scores instead of relying on confidence metrics. This quality-aware approach guides pseudo-label selection during iterative SSL training, while diversity measures (DPP, Vendi score, IntDiv) mitigate confirmation bias. Experiments on a proprietary business dataset (1000 annotated + 10000 unannotated documents) show QUEST improves F1 from 64% to 74% and reduces empty predictions by 45% (from 12% to 6.5%). On the DocILE benchmark (600 annotated + 20000 unannotated documents), QUEST achieves a 50% F1 score (up from 42%) and reduces empty predictions by 19% (from 27% to 22%). The framework's interpretable quality assessments and robustness to annotation scarcity make it particularly suited for business documents, where structural consistency and data completeness are paramount.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Automating table extraction from business documents with sparse annotations
Improving semi-supervised learning by assessing table extraction quality
Reducing empty predictions and enhancing structural consistency in extracted tables
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Quality-aware SSL framework for table extraction
Novel F1-predicting quality assessment model
Diversity measures mitigate confirmation bias
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
E
Eliott Thomas
Yooz, France
M
Mickael Coustaty
La Rochelle Université, France
A
Aurélie Joseph
Yooz, France
G
Gaspar Deloin
Yooz, France
E
Elodie Carel
Yooz, France
V
V. P. d'Andecy
Yooz, France
J
J. Ogier
La Rochelle Université, France